Opera 124.0.5705.42 Stable update

[revalenz]

revalenz last edited by

When are you going to release a new version for Opera Beta to fix CVE-2025-13223?

[bbildman]

bbildman last edited by leocg

I really would appreciate it if someone from the development team might address what has happened to my Speed Dial icons, some are missing images of icons within the larger icons, and some of the large icons are simply blank. All the blank icons still work when clicked, the large icons as well as the smaller ones within large icons. I have been addressing this since O122 and my comments have not even been acknowledged, help!!

[yuseijaden]

yuseijaden last edited by

I have a problem with Aria, the button can't be add, it's normal?
It only appears in the address bar.

[sicu220]

sicu220 @yuseijaden last edited by

@yuseijaden https://blogs.opera.com/news/2025/11/how-to-opt-in-and-upgrade-to-the-new-opera-ai-in-your-browser/

[yuseijaden]

yuseijaden @sicu220 last edited by

@sicu220: Thank you ! I understand better now

[Kilian01]

Kilian01 last edited by

Why is the Linux release after 2 days still unavailable from the repository? This really should be automatically pushed on release.

[Opera-QA-Team]

Opera-QA-Team Opera @sicu220 last edited by

@sicu220: Hi, thanks - we are aware of this problem, but thanks for the reminder!

[flaviu2]

flaviu2 @andrew84 last edited by

@andrew84
Yes, I noticed this bug appear from time to time, but seems not be present on every versions.

[Opera-QA-Team]

Opera-QA-Team Opera @sicu220 last edited by

@sicu220: Hi, thanks for the feedback - we'll check it.

[history411]

history411 last edited by

"Update."
Slowly I turned...
Another stolen hour of my time.
Opera, as soon as I figure out how to block your pesky updates I will do so.
Or maybe just go back to Firefox.

[Opera-QA-Team]

Opera-QA-Team Opera @history411 last edited by

@history411: Hello, thanks for sharing. Updates are important for the proper functioning of the browser, they contain bugfixes for issues reported also from Users, so we always suggest to have the newest version.

[Opera-QA-Team]

Opera-QA-Team Opera @bbildman last edited by

@bbildman: Hi, thanks for the feedback, we will investigate the issue. So this happened after update to v122? Is it only about your old SpeedDials, or also newly added? What icons can you see when you go to opera://bookmarks -> folder Speed Dials? Are they OK or also changed?

[ManagerBOSS]

ManagerBOSS last edited by

After the latest browser update to version 124.0.5705.42, the pre-filled login feature stopped working. I have my logins saved in the browser and I haven't made any changes there. However, now when I want to log in to a URL where I have my login details saved, neither the login nor the password are pre-filled as they used to be, and what's more, when I enter my login, the password is not automatically filled in either. When I go to a specific URL, the key is missing in the top right corner, even though the URL is in the list of saved logins. Please note that this mainly concerns URLs that contain IP addresses, e.g., https://192.168.1.2.

[TheLamer]

TheLamer @Opera-QA-Team last edited by

@Opera-QA-Team

The deb is busted since this release:

11.74 Setting up opera-stable (124.0.5705.42) ...
11.82 update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/opera-stable doesn't exist
11.85 dpkg: error processing package opera-stable (--configure):
11.85  installed opera-stable package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

Tested on bookworm, Trixie, and Noble. Related to renaming the package but the deb contents do not contain that bin.

./bin
./bin/opera

The problem is specifically in your postinst in the deb:

EOF
            chmod 755 /etc/cron.daily/opera-browser
            # Run once now to add Opera's pgp key to apt's keyring
            /etc/cron.daily/opera-browser > /dev/null 2>&1


        update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-www-browser x-www-browser /usr/bin/opera-stable 120 \
                --slave /usr/share/man/man1/x-www-browser.1.gz x-www-browser.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/opera-stable.1.gz
        update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gnome-www-browser gnome-www-browser /usr/bin/opera-stable 120 \
                --slave /usr/share/man/man1/gnome-www-browser.1.gz gnome-www-browser.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/opera-stable.1.gz
        ;;

esac

Because the name was changed your deb build env looks like it templates that name into the post install hooks and every deb is failing now.

[Kilian01]

Kilian01 last edited by

Linux release is now available but fails to properly install. Please fix this immediately. I may remind you that this is calld stable, not beta or developer.

[Scrofa]

Scrofa last edited by

After the 124.0.5705.42 update I am unable to even open Opera in Ubuntu. Fix this.

[ironbone]

ironbone last edited by

The snap opera version does not work with Wayland on Ubuntu

[ironbone]

ironbone @Scrofa last edited by

@scrofa: try as a temporary solution
opera --ozone-platform=x11

[Scrofa]

Scrofa @ironbone last edited by

@ironbone Thanks. It opens with that command but how can I keep it opened without closing the terminal?

[filbo]

filbo @Opera-QA-Team last edited by

@opera-qa-team: same thing as @thelamer

The Linux APT .deb for opera-stable (specifically) is failing on install due to:

update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/x-www-browser x-www-browser /usr/bin/opera-stable 120 \                                                                  --slave /usr/share/man/man1/x-www-browser.1.gz x-www-browser.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/opera-stable.1.gz                                         update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gnome-www-browser gnome-www-browser /usr/bin/opera-stable 120 \                                                          --slave /usr/share/man/man1/gnome-www-browser.1.gz gnome-www-browser.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/opera-stable.1.gz

-- which tries to link /usr/bin/opera-stable as /usr/bin/{x,gnome}-www-browser. Since the binary is /usr/bin/opera (sans -stable), this fails.

I note that it fails despite the priority 120 being lower than other choices (which means it will never in fact need to follow the path you've supplied). This seems like a tiny bug in update-alternatives(1), fwiw.

This should be fixed by changing the code to tell it to link /usr/bin/opera. You could also actually rename the binary, but if you do that, there will be many other changes elsewhere in your packaging, so I wouldn't go that way.

Meanwhile, your code also has a few other anomalies in this area. The postinst scripts for opera-developer, opera-beta, and opera-stable all give the same priority of 120. Other browsers give a higher priority to their 'stable' branch and successively lower for less stable branches.

And you instruct it to link man pages which do not in fact exist. This apparently doesn't bother update-alternatives even if your candidate is the winner, oddly enough.