Opera 110
-
iosaddict 0 last edited by iosaddict 0
@burnout426 hi, nice find and very interesting read, but also that’s mainly for new major version. As for security fixes, according to the author;
“””
A slightly modified, less complicated variant of the above process can be used to perform such minor version updates, and in our case this smaller process usually takes just a few hours.
“””I have no objection with Opera delaying major version upgrade, at the very minimum, at least keeping up to date with extended stable.
-
-
leocg Moderator Volunteer last edited by
@iosaddict-0 Regarding what I said, usually those security issues require a lot of things to happen for someone to be a victim of them and that's why I said that I wasn't worried about a little delay in having the security fixes in Opera.
-
sklunk last edited by
Has anybody experienced trouble with pages loading on 110?
Yesterday I updated from 109.0.5097.80 to 110.0.5130.23. Although I am behind a corporate firewall, many sites that I went to minutes before the update would not work correctly after the update. Many gave me handshake failures and 404 errors related to CloudShare. Other sites loaded with strange formatting, and some would load but without images.
Like I said, the only thing that changed in those 10 minutes was updating Opera version. I rolled back to 109.0.5097.80 and everything is fine.
-
antonio1678 last edited by
@adam1709: Now they have another to catch up on. There is yet another 0-day annouced today: CVE-2024-4947: Type Confusion in V8
-
antonio1678 last edited by
@burnout426: So they miss the other 0-days CVE-2024-4761 and CVE-2024-4947
-
iosaddict 0 last edited by
@leocg this is not true at all. Most people don’t take precautions when browsing the internet and you literally don’t have to do anything but to simply visit a crafted page.
-
leocg Moderator Volunteer last edited by
@iosaddict-0 So, someone needs to create a page that exploits the security flaw and trick people to go open it
-
iosaddict 0 last edited by
@leocg and that exists per Google? That's why it's called a zero day.
"Google is aware that an exploit for CVE-2024-4947 exists in the wild." Maybe not for you, it is very easy to trick users to open links. -
multiwebinc last edited by
Scrollbars are still broken on Linux, going on like a year now... Also, tabs frequently do not close when clicking the X on the tab and you have to right click and select close.
-
Healing-Cross last edited byI wouldn't find it too bad, actually, if they referred to security fixes, when they were backported into an earlier version of Chromium.
It would at least give me some assurance, they were caring. -
firuz-u7 last edited byIt is not possible to select part of the address in the address bar, when I click on the address bar it does not respond to the mouse button
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
andrew84 last edited by andrew84
@kened I never relied on built-in adBlocker.
I use built-in adBlocker + uBlock and had no problems with youtube's ads but recently I started to receive warning massage randomly that I'm using adBlocker.First it was just a popup which I could just close by pressing the [x], later the message stayed for a while (~5 sec.) without possibility to close it, today I received message that I have only 3 video views limit before video player will be blocked.
Maybe this is because I'm using older version of Opera because I tried in Opera Developer and in latest Edge and there's no such issues but there is almost no browsing data because I don't use these browsers daily.
*Right now I deleted all cookies /data related to youtube and currently I don't see the warning message but maybe temporary.
-
tastodd last edited byI use built-in adBlocker + uBlock
Why use the built-in adBlocker? Isn't one uBlock enough?
I only use uBlock and in 10+ years I have never had problems with YouTube and warning windows there
