Opera 65.0.3467.16 beta update

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @temkem last edited by

@temkem Maybe because it doesn't make much sense to edit the address of a bookmark?

[temkem]

temkem @leocg last edited by

@leocg Then why is it possible to edit its name? This can be done immediately when you add to the bookmarks!

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @temkem last edited by

@temkem Because it makes sense to edit the name, so the user can choose one that is better for her/him to know what the bookmark is about.

[temkem]

temkem @leocg last edited by

@leocg said in Opera 65.0.3467.16 beta update:

Because it makes sense to edit the name, so the user can choose one that is better for her/him to know what the bookmark is about.

Same thing with the address of a bookmark. Sometimes the domain of the site changes and when you click on the bookmark you are redirected to a new address. Therefore, it makes sense to add the ability to edit and address bookmarks!

[A Former User]

A Former User @temkem last edited by

@temkem On this point I agree with you. And I also have still some http pages as bookmarks saved, where there will surely be a change to https in the future...

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @temkem last edited by

@temkem I would simply create a new bookmark for the new page and discard the old one since it's no longer valid.
Anyway, you can change the bookmarks address in the bookmarks manager page, like I said.

[temkem]

temkem @leocg last edited by

@leocg I want convenience and speed. You can use Chromium with minimal amenities!

[tina]

tina Opera @temkem last edited by tina

Hi @temkem,

1. We'll look at this. Probably you need to wait a bit ( around a min) to get preferences update from server.
2. Yes, we assume that bookmarks-panel will have only some top-using functionality as Edit name of a bookmark and Remove. More complex functionality as combining and editing multiple bookmarks you can do from opera://bookmarks page
3. We'll also discuss this suggestion. Now it works exactly like opera://bookmarks

[andrew84]

andrew84 last edited by andrew84

Here (on Win8) the bookmarks panel's right border is still flickering white when resizing it in dark mode.

*Allow uploading .gif images directly on forum for 'Upload Image' option. Currently it's not allowed

[temkem]

temkem @andrew84 last edited by temkem

@andrew84 said in Opera 65.0.3467.16 beta update:

Here (on Win8) the bookmarks panel's right border is still flickering white when resizing it in dark mode.

Confirm! On Windows 7, the same thing happens!

*Allow uploading .gif images directly on forum for 'Upload Image' option. Currently it's not allowed

Download files. gif was not supported on the Opera forum. Always had to send files to a third-party service, and then post here.

[A Former User]

A Former User last edited by

Why not make the skip option as it exists in firefox and vivaldi browsers?

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @Guest last edited by

@userob Skip what?

[andrew84]

andrew84 @temkem last edited by andrew84

@temkem said:

Download files. gif was not supported on the Opera forum. Always had to send files to a third-party service, and then post here.

After changes now it should. One more thing is that all the images (in the blog and on forum) should be hidden under spoilers, useful for those who have expensive or limited mobile internet's data plan.

[andrew84]

andrew84 last edited by

Still bad looking 'Loading..' text and empty icon on every new tab (shared start page flag, the same in Developer).

[temkem]

temkem @andrew84 last edited by

@andrew84 I think you should be allowed to test the internal assemblies of the Opera browser! Then they will see at a very early stage - mistakes that they usually produce and they will be ashamed to produce such a "raw product"!
Although... they may be thus pretending in front of their superiors that they are working, but in fact just throwing out " Raw "builds" for testing to users.

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @temkem last edited by

@temkem I don't think it would make any difference since most of those issues are not exactly significant, not to mention the ones that may just be a matter of opinion.

[andrew84]

andrew84 @temkem last edited by

@temkem: I think that they are in course about many bugs but release the build anyway (some scheduled release plan or time deadlines reason). I'm not ready to be a tester yet )) because I like to test the things only I'm interested in (UI mainly and its uniformity/style).
Currently I'm still on O58 and at the same I try to find (still without much success, unfortunately) some good extensions for start page and search popup to use it in Edge.
I really like Edge's UI and dark theme, but it's still a featureless browser.

[temkem]

temkem @andrew84 last edited by

@andrew84 I have been trying for several years to inform them about many errors and not the correct operation of functions. They do not want to listen and conduct their policy. So I left for the Vivaldi browser. But I'm just sad that once the best browser turned into a bunch of junk, from which nothing can be properly configured. But they have devoted all their efforts to make a new and beautiful interface, Bravo! He became a handsome, but absolutely clumsy.

[A Former User]

A Former User @leocg last edited by

@leocg said:

@userob Skip what?

I was thinking to skip this version as in Vivaldi https://imgur.com/Zb5uhl1

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @andrew84 last edited by

@andrew84 This is how things work in real life, there is no such thing as release a software without bugs.

If the bug is a showstopper, it may prevent a release, otherwise, it won't.