Opera 69.0.3686.77 Stable update

[A Former User]

A Former User last edited by

When using workspaces with more than one Opera window, it is possible to lose all tabs in that workspace if you were to close windows in a wrong order, like if you close second window with selected workspace and no tabs open last.

[A Former User]

A Former User last edited by

@NikolaPisarek Is 69.0.3686.77 the latest version or is 69.0.3686.80 the latest

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @Guest last edited by

@tmj94 77 is the latest one, at least on the FTP.

[sac]

sac last edited by

Aren't the extension icons behaving funny?

[sac]

sac @sac last edited by

@sac: I mean, like overlapping

[andrew84]

andrew84 @sac last edited by

@sac you mean this (after minimizing/restoring window)?

[symbaloo]

symbaloo last edited by

Stable, but incompatible with Sandboxie?
Can I go back to the previous stable version?

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @symbaloo last edited by

@symbaloo Yes, you can.

[sac]

sac @andrew84 last edited by

@andrew84 exactly! Though apparently after restarting my PC it's working fine now.

[andrew84]

andrew84 @sac last edited by

@sac said in Opera 69.0.3686.77 Stable update:

after restarting my PC it's working fine

I doubt. This one is 'animation' from Chromium, I have it on both Chrome and Opera.

[ext]

ext last edited by leocg

There is a new update: 69.0.3686.95

[Caps are not allowed]

https://forums.opera.com/topic/42130/opera-69-0-3686-77-stable-update?_=1595872318897

https://forums.opera.com/topic/42130/opera-69-0-3686-77-stable-update/9?_=1595872318899

@kmielczarczyk

I have a question for Opera's developers. Why did you ignore these reported bugs?

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @ext last edited by

@ext They don't ignore but there is something called priority. Also, a bug can take a long time to be fixed.

[ext]

ext last edited by

@leocg

I understand. But someone should refer to the fact that this will be checked and fixed in the near future.

[leocg]

leocg Moderator Volunteer @ext last edited by

@ext There is no need for it.

[ext]

ext last edited by

@leocg

So I am waiting for fixing these mistakes.