Very long extension moderation process
-
-
kurtq last edited by
Hello! Today version 1.7.7.2 was checked and rejected, all corrections according to your recommendations were made in the updated version 1.7.7.3. Please check 1.7.7.3, thanks
-
-
A Former User last edited by
@tnowak
"There must be no unused files." - It seems there are no unused files.
"Well-known third-party libraries must be in a genuine and in an unchanged form. They should be acquired from the vendor’s official website or a CDN." - we use two libraries - jquery and D3js. They in a genuine and in an unchanged form. And they acquired from the official website. -
A Former User last edited by
Hey guys, we submitted our add-on on the 8th of Oct, 2018. Is there a way to speed up the moderation process?
-
oktools last edited by
Please post the extension. Made all the corrections indicated by the moderators.
package/21805
OkTools - v4.3 was submitted. Awaiting moderation.
oktools; Aug 22, 2019 12:35:01 PM UTC -
-
tnowak Opera last edited by
@signalhire : Your extension contains obfuscated or minified scripts.
Please take a look at https://dev.opera.com/extensions/acceptance-criteria/ -
phaistonian last edited by
@tnowak Could you please take a look at
package/233927?Been trying to get this online for almost a year now
ps: Implemented what you suggested a while back.
-
oktools last edited by
@tnowak Replaced absolutely all links from http to https in the extension and on the addons.opera.com page.
-
-
A Former User last edited by
@tnowak could you answer my question?
@commaticus said in Very long extension moderation process:@tnowak
"There must be no unused files." - It seems there are no unused files.
"Well-known third-party libraries must be in a genuine and in an unchanged form. They should be acquired from the vendor’s official website or a CDN." - we use two libraries - jquery and D3js. They in a genuine and in an unchanged form. And they acquired from the official website. -
burnout426 Volunteer last edited by
@tnowak said in Very long extension moderation process:
"Well-known third-party libraries must be in a genuine and in an unchanged form. They should be acquired from the vendor’s official website or a CDN."
How is the check done? SHA-256 hash comparison between the included file and the file for the latest version of the library?
Was just wondering how @commaticus could check before-hand just to make sure the system will be happy.
-
tnowak Opera last edited by
@commaticus
- Unused files in the last package you submitted:
→ find -type f -size 0 ./site/removelisting.js ./noconcat/1_sth/obj.js ./all/script.js - Could you please provide links to these files on the official websites? I can only find ones with a comment containing the version number on the first line.
@burnout426
Libraries need to be byte for byte exact copies, so SHA-256 hash comparison can be used to check that. - Unused files in the last package you submitted:
-
-
oinkandstuff last edited byIn my opinion, why is Opera is making live Debug of Extension on a public thread?
Please fix the delays in Opera extensions and reply on the extension admin-dev chat directly.
I have extensions with + 1 year waiting...
Just fix the delays, hire more people to do reviews and stop this circus.Greetings.
-
leocg Moderator Volunteer last edited by
@oinkandstuff said in Very long extension moderation process:
why is Opera is making live Debug of Extension on a public thread?
Because people started doing it here?
-
A Former User last edited by
Could you please take a look at package/239325/
The automated process didnt seem to work.
Ive waited over a week with no response, just submitted an update.. but I dont imagine it will add itself.. -
-
A Former User last edited by
@tnowak, we have made all the appropriate changes and submitted the extension once again. Could you check it at your convenience?
