@4troses I've partially solved this by 'starring' https://sync.opera.com/ so it shows up on the New Tab page, under the Top Sites. This gives you one-direction access to your existing bookmarks (i.e. you can't edit them in any way), but it's better than nothing. Only works if your synced data is not protected by an additional sync passphrase...
Best posts made by shintoplasm01
-
RE: Where are the bookmarks.Opera Touch
-
Google Search ads are not blockedOpera for Android
Hello. I've noticed that ads in Google Search results are not blocked in my Opera for Android, even though the adblocker is on and appears to function well elsewhere. Is this a bug or a deliberate internal whitelisting? No websites are whitelisted in the adblocker settings.
Details:
- Android version: 11
- Phone: Google Pixel 3a
- Opera version: 61.2.3076.56749
- URL: https://www.google.co.uk/m?q=buy+tyres&client=ms-opera-mobile&channel=new&espv=1
- Adblocker enabled
- Data savings disabled
- Steps to reproduce: Set Google as your search engine and search for 'buy tyres' (or any other obvious search terms looking to purchase something).
- Expected behaviour: No Goole Search ads should be shown.
- Actual behaviour: All Google Search ads are shown, both at the top and at the bottom of the page. Interestingly, no Bing ads are shown when searching for the same terms.
-
RE: Addons "Cashback Web Monitor"Opera for computers
@leocg Does the flag opera://flags/#cashback not disable this extension? It's disabled by default in my version, but that could be dependent on location.
- Blogs
-
RE: Extension Manifest v3 - Should we worry for Opera extensions' future?Opera add-ons
@leocg Thanks for responding to one of my questions. However, I am even more curious to know what would happen to Opera's handling of other ad-blocking extensions (other than the built-in adblocker) - is Opera providing any feedback on this proposed plan? If it goes through as currently drafted, will Opera handle extensions (and limit their functionality) as per the manifest or would it retain a backwards compatibility mode? I know it's early days, but this is an important matter close to many users' hearts.
-
RE: Opera Touch vs Opera Mobile. The missing key stoneOpera Browser
@ultravio1et I know it's a bit of a hassle, but you can get to your bookmarks (read-only) by 'starring' https://sync.opera.com/
This will give you a direct link from the new tab page to your bookmarks, but you won't be able to edit them in any way.
-
RE: The Opera browser for Android hit a new record of 80 million MAUs during Q4-2020Blogs
Thanks Stefan and thanks to the Opera mobile devs. One gripe: it would be nice if you could follow the main Chromium version in Opera for Android, instead of being one version behind... Do you backport security fixes from Chromium 88 into the current Opera 62 (which is at Chromium 87)?
-
Extension Manifest v3 - Should we worry for Opera extensions' future?Opera add-ons
https://www.ghacks.net/2019/01/22/chrome-extension-manifest-v3-could-end-ublock-origin-for-chrome/
Google has published a draft manifest for what Chrome/Chromium extensions can and cannot do in the future. Although this is not yet finalised, quite a few concerns have been raised by adblocker developers - not least gorhill himself - about how this could effectively kill adblocking as we know it.
Some initial questions, then:
- Will Opera - as a Chromium derivative - be required to follow this manifest if finalised?
- Are Opera's devs involved in the discussion around the proposed changes, and if so, what's Opera's position?
- Should this manifest be finalised, would Opera be able to circumvent the changes (e.g. by allowing the previous extension capabilities for all extensions hosted in the Opera Store)?
- Will Opera's built-in adblocking capability be affected in any way by the proposed changes?
All of this is quite worrying for users' ability to control what and how they browser. It would be interesting to have people's thoughts on this subject...
-
Crash when selecting 'Open in Touch' via Share menuOpera Browser
I couldn't find anywhere in the stable iOS app to report bugs/crashes, so am posting it here.
Version: 1.6.0 (Stable, not Testflight beta)
Description: Opera Touch crashes consistently on iOS 12.2 whenever 'Share' >> 'Open in Touch' is selected for any URL in other apps. I think Opera Touch crashes somewhere in the process of something, because a 'ghost window' flashes very quickly after 'Open in Touch' is tapped, but then this disappears and I remain in the originating app.I have captured a screenshot of this Opera Touch 'ghost screen':
-
RE: Opera 74.0.3911.203 Stable updateBlogs
@rastanz According to the various Reddit discussions it's a broken internal extension, which should be receiving a silent update to fix this. I don't really have any further details.
Latest posts made by shintoplasm01
-
RE: Debunking misinformation about Opera’s browsersBlogs
@locutus Not really relevant. Firstly, this thread is about Opera specifically - and the specific concerns raised in that post I linked to.
Secondly, while I agree that Brave has its own share of (rather small IMHO) controversies, but AFAIK no-one's identified any suspicious connections being made to Brave's servers.
-
RE: Debunking misinformation about Opera’s browsersBlogs
@burnout426 Thanks for your responses!
Didn't Opera recently buy back some/all of their shares from that Chinese consortium? Or am I getting this wrong? -
RE: Debunking misinformation about Opera’s browsersBlogs
NOTE: I'm pasting the full comment's text for better visibility. I did not write it myself.
"This video doesn't say anything that hasn't been said a million times before. Opera isn't a privacy-focused browser. I figure most people who are using it don't really care that much and enjoy its features. Not sure why it focuses on the Geolocation stuff, of all things, to point out though. That's kind of whatever. The browser will be pinging Opera's own servers to check for updates periodically anyway, which will give them your IP which can then be narrowed down to a location. I'd say a more concerning issue with Opera is the fact that everything you type in the address bar, and every site you visit, is sent to their servers. Sometimes in multiple ways. Every time you enter a keystroke into the address bar, it will attempt to send it to two places: 1. To your default search engine to provide search suggestions based on what you just typed (which can be disabled through settings by disabling "Improve search suggestions.") This is kinda whatever since you're probably going to send them the full query anyway and are already trusting them with your searches. 2. To weather.opera-api2.com/autocomplete to attempt to look for a corresponding location to display the weather for places in the suggestions area. This can only be disabled via opera://flags by setting the #address-bar-dropdown-cities option to Disabled. Having everything typed get sent to their servers essentially gives them the ability to profile your search queries. Are they using this data to profile you? Obviously we don't know for sure, but a small tooltip showing you the weather in the search suggestions of a potential location that you're typing certainly isn't worth every keystroke being sent to, and potentially stored on, their servers and tied to you. Additionally every time you visit a website, when it is finished loading, Opera will make a call to its own servers to an API containing the domain name. Let's say I visit privacyguides.org in Opera, when it is finished loading Opera will make a call to: speeddials.opera.com/api/v1/thumbnails/www.privacyguides.org. This allows for a complete profiling by Opera of every site you visit with their browser. There is no way to disable this, even through flags. The only way around this is by nullrouting speeddials.opera.com, which will also break the news feed on the new tab page if you have it enabled. This service seemingly innocuously fetches thumbnail images for sites for the speeddial squares, but again the privacy cost here is very high for something so trivial that could be accomplished through other means like caching a site's favicon without phoning home, for example. And why does the browser need to acquire these images for every single site that you visit? Why not just a single time when you add a site intentionally to the speed dial section? It makes no sense. Again, we don't know for sure if they're using this data to profile you and store the sites you visit but it would be very trivial for them to do so. Furthermore to that, when you visit a site in Opera the domain name will be sent to another location. Assuming we're visiting example.com, before loading the page Opera will make a POST request to sitecheck.opera.com/api/v2/check with a payload containing the example.com domain. This, again, allows for an entire collection of your browsing history on their servers. This can be disabled by turning off the "Protect me from malicious sites" option under "Privacy and Security". There are much better ways from a privacy perspective of performing a malicious site look-up, such as periodically downloading a complete list of problematic domains and performing a comparison entirely locally which is what Firefox does. The way this is implemented in Opera is sloppy, at best, and intentionally poor if you're being cynical since it allows for trivial collection of your entire browsing history. These are the real big deal issues with Opera. Everyone using it with anything resembling default settings is essentially sending their entire browsing and search history to the Opera servers, which can be tied to you. And unless you've carefully disabled all the required options AND nullrouted speeddials.opera.com this basically applies to everyone using the browser. There aren't many browsers brazen enough to outright collect data directly on every single domain you visit and every keystroke you enter into its address bar. Opera is one of the ones that does. These are the real, tangible issues with this software. People talk a lot about their connections to China, point out their shady dealings in other areas etc. but most people will just brush those off. People need to know, in no uncertain terms, that this browser is sending your entire browsing history to their servers. I'd like to say these issues are just bad design under the hood and not intentionally malicious, but that would be giving them the benefit of the doubt which they've really not earned as a company. Through cynical eyes, it seems they've tried to implement hardcore tracking of what their users type and visit and attempted to hide it behind "innocent" services that they can potentially excuse away as trivial functions if it were brought up. If Opera were interested in privacy, they would remove these invasive functions and re-implement them in a more privacy-respecting way, which wouldn't be particularly difficult to do. The fact it would be relatively easy to avoid doing these things and the fact they've kept them how they are for many versions now brings out the cynic in me and tells me they probably want them just the way they are."
-
RE: Debunking misinformation about Opera’s browsersBlogs
Well, you have not really addressed some very specific concerns raised elsewhere. A good summary can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/14bisgq/comment/jog0c1x/
-
RE: Opera launches beta version of VPN Pro, a device-wide VPN in Opera Browser for AndroidBlogs
Hah. Trust your data to the nightmare that is Opera's privacy policies.
-
RE: Enjoy the new version 68 of Opera for Android!Blogs
And still the adblocker is the worst of its kind, and still no support for AdGuard's HTTPS filtering (the only Android browser which doesn't allow this!).
-
RE: Opera for Android integrates Ethereum Layer 2, bringing access to DeFiBlogs
Okay, brilliant, lots more crypto and all that. But when will Opera for Android finally block Google/Bing search ads and Twitter/LinkedIn promoted posts? Your built-in adblocker is unworthy of that name, and Opera is the only Chromium browser to disallow AdGuard's HTTPS filtering. I've reported this to your devs ad nauseam, but answer came there none!
-
RE: Introducing Opera’s new Web3 initiative: Crypto Browser Project now available in public beta for Windows, Mac and AndroidBlogs
Another browser, more fragmentation. Why?
-
RE: Let’s take a look back at 2021 in Opera desktopBlogs
It's 2022 and we still can't sync our extensions.
-
RE: The best browser for your last minute Christmas ShoppingBlogs
But if you want a browser that actually blocks Google Search ads, look elsewhere.