Multiple Processes for opera.exe
-
christoph142 last edited by
I'm wondering why so many people think that this is something bad and start complaining about it cause it's not!
Besides what Rafael mentioned already, it actually speeds up the application since processes can be run independently in parallel on different cores of your CPU. -
burnout426 Volunteer last edited by
I'm wondering why so many people think that this is something bad
I think it's awesome. But, it depends on how much free ram you have and how many tabs/processes you want to be able to have open at once. Sometimes those two things can conflict with each other.
Others just don't like the concept of it even if it doesn't cause a problem.
-
07y05m24d last edited by
Single process programs didn't seem to have issues with multi-threading and multi-core.
I suspect the primary benefits are process stabilization and security; taking advantage of code already in the operating system.
Regarding security, it's much harder for one process to gain unintended access to and/or modify the memory structures of another.
Regarding stability, running add-ons and plug-ins out-of-process results with better stability and responsiveness. When that add-on or plug-in hangs a thread it isn't necessarily detrimental to the entire process. But it takes much more thought, planning and programming to build that type of stability into your program; and it won't be as good as that, which is built into the operating system.
In effect, it's much easier to achieve better security, stability and responsiveness by going out-of-process.
-
-
suntana last edited by
Ahhhhh, so THAT's why there are those multiple opera.exe processes. I had definitely noticed them and had meant to ask about that.
With Opera 11.52, Opera 11.64 and Opera 12.16 I HAD been getting many cases recently of that error message that Opera Needs to Restart. I haven't encountered that error message with Opera 20.0.1387.91 so far.
-
lem729 last edited by
I have maybe 29 instances of Opera.exe*32 in my Task Manger (under the processes tab). I'm using Windows 7. That seems like a lot of instances of it. ebonystinger only had 6. Is something wrong with my setup. I'm using Windows 7. Now I do have a few tabs open
Now I have over 20 extensions. Maybe they set up separate processes. Most of the processes are not using that much memory. It's just that 20 simultaneous processes sounded like a big number. I have plenty of RAM on my computer -- 8. -
blackbird71 last edited byI have maybe 29 instances of Opera.exe*32 in my Task Manger (under the processes tab). I'm using Windows 7. That seems like a lot of instances of it. ... Is something wrong with my setup. ... Now I do have a few tabs open
Now I have over 20 extensions. Maybe they set up separate processes. Most of the processes are not using that much memory. It's just that 20 simultaneous processes sounded like a big number. I have plenty of RAM on my computer -- 8.There's nothing wrong with your setup for the browser configured like you've described. As @rafaelluik explained above, each browser extension will use its own separate process, the GUI will use a process, and each tab will use a separate process. With 20 extensions, a GUI, and an open tab, you will indeed see over 21 processes.
-
lem729 last edited by
Thanks blackbird71. I read the thread too fast, and missed the part you reference. I thought, wow, 29 is a lot. (actually, I may have -- smile -- 25 extensions. Sometimes I download just to test, and then latter, get rid of.
Now I used to have a check in my Chrome settings saying, to keep certain background processes running when I wasn't in Chrome, and I did start to get GPU warnings from my Norton security suite. Because in addition to Opera, Chrome was doing a helluva lot of stuff, even when I wasn't using it. And I hardly use Chrome now. I pulled the check out of that Chrome setting (I'd forgotten I'd put it there or even why) (maybe it was a default), and I'm doing better with my available RAM and the GPU. I haven't gotten a Norton warning since.
-
dededere last edited by
oh so this is why my old notebook gets overheated and restarts via bluescreen
great job Opera ^^ realy...AWESOME -.-' -
lem729 last edited by
Hmmm, well I have no idea what the resources are of your "old" notebook. That may be the problem for you. And yes, it is my understanding that Opera 21 takes more system resources than the version that it superseded (Opera 20). However, the multi-processes make that less likely, than without them. When I was browsing with Chrome quite a bit, I got CPU used up messages, and blue screens. Since I started browsing more exclusively with Opera Bing (19-21), I haven't had a blue screen, or a message about a CPU problem.
-
dvk-ru1 last edited by
If a high CPU load leads to such an overheat that the laptop goes blue screen, it's a more dramatic problem than just Chrome's hunger for resources. Even if you find another browser, the difference won't be too great. You'd better check the hardware, clean the dust and replace some thermal grease, maybe.
-
lem729 last edited by
3 months, no problem, since I stopped with Chrome (I had been using that along with Opera 12), and started using Opera 19-21. Also, I had Chrome on a setting to keep on, even when I wasn't using Chrome. There were some games I used. That might have been the problem too. It wasn't a laptop. Mine was a desktop.
Also I did get messages from my Norton Security program warning that "Chrome" was using almost of my CPU. I never get messages like that about Opera (haha, crossing my fingers), at least not yet.
Now dededere does have an old notebook, and that bluescreen problem may well be more than Opera.
-
-
evoid last edited by
[mod edit: stay on topic and don't hijack posts please]
Speed is not everything... one needs some luxury and style too. Opera lost that somewhere. Multiple instances is not really a good way forward, even if it does increase speed. -
tcolgan001 last edited by
After updating to multiprocessor version had definite computer slow-down.
It's back to 12.17 for me (a version that also works with outlook).
In addition, always thought that there was a definite advantage of a single-process browser. If things screw up, just shut it down and restart it. Multiple processes seem to multiply like rabbit droppings. Need to open task manager to clean them all up.
Anyone else feel the same?
-
supernicknick last edited by
Opera 12 64bit runs plugins on a separate process, so if for example Flash crashes, Opera 12-64 doesnt. Or so have been my experiences. Running windows on a separate process is a memory eating gimmick imho, i have yet to see any benefit from that. In fact, if it goes crazy it is kept within a few cores (i have 8 in total) and doesnt affect the rest of the PC.
-
christoph142 last edited by
A tab may crash as well. And in this case, a multi-process browser doesn't die with it, but can handle it.
There's light and shadow to everything on earth... -
taintedangel last edited by
With Opera using so many processes, it weighs down my system and slows my entire system down and most times it crashes my computer.
-
lando242 last edited by
Yeah, its not Opera causing the problem. Having several processes running doesn't cause problems. Windows itself off a clean install generally runs 40-60 processes depending on the version of the OS you are using. Opera running 5 is not the sources of your computer crashing nor is it why your computer is running slowly. Either your system is so old it will be eligible to vote in 2016 or you've got some malware or other system issue as the root cause.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Opera 26 takes huge time to open/close tabs (about 1 sec compared to 0 in opera 12) whether it's due to process per tab or not. When click new/anylink/close, there's no wait cursor, just hanging for 1 second.
i5 8GB Win7-64Is it same case for other users?
I try to get used to new version but I hate this. Like bad dream where you try to run and cannot, moving sooo slow
