Reporting and Moderation
-
A Former User last edited by admin
Well, I submitted a post yesterday, in the 'Lounge', the topic being on page 2. It was held, then approved, but the problem is the topic didn't up, and nobody presumably would see the update - except for me personally, 'cause I knew it was to appear.
-
blackbird71 last edited by
That seems to be normal operation for these forums. I see the same thing happen in topics where I get trapped for moderation. For somewhat older threads, it can be a major issue (particularly for long moderation hold times), since the prior thread posters may never see an update has occurred as the index listing scrolls off the bottom. Moreover, the lower-left-corner user notifications about postings can be very "iffy", both in terms of how soon/often they appear and how short their viewing time before they forever evaporate. I wish it all were otherwise with the forum's protocols, but it seems not to be.
-
blackbird71 last edited by
Hmm. All 3 out of my 3 prior posts today are blocked for moderation. Have you tightened up the filters a bunch or am I just a favorite target at the moment?
Edited to add: at least this one got through.
-
A Former User last edited by
@davehawley & @rafaelluik
It's still 1st of April, you bastards!Oh...kay?
I don't know what you mean... Sorry for the long time to answer, the citation notifications (via pop-ups) simply aren't working. cc/ @digmed -
A Former User last edited by
They might have just turned the notifications off for fun on the 1st April.
-
A Former User last edited by
I think they're broken for many months.
I have 84 notifications according to my dashboard's profile button. I can't access them anywhere.
-
A Former User last edited by
Nah, right now I came here because I'd got one.
And this time it was quick (unless I got the previous one). -
A Former User last edited by
I've found that the only way to get reliable notifications of anything is to star the thread!
-
A Former User last edited by
@sgunhouse
Probably too many links ... they
really shouldn't count links to ...opera.com in the spam filtering.So far as I can see, most spam contains only one, rarer two, link/links. Three-four isn't frequent at all, more could be considered a weird exception.
-
A Former User last edited by
Right but in those, lots of links seem the same - thus it can be assessed by our Helling Machine.
I doubt I should expect the tech guys to get at it soon though... :rolleyes: -
A Former User last edited by
Just visited Firefox's support site today, and I noticed in one case, they officially suggest certain users to install Opera - and they have a link to that.
So why?
I'm about some parity here. There is a thread of mine that was closed - "Firefox Tinkering". It is/was in the Lounge, and it didn't facilitate any prompts to use Firefox instead of Opera.
So I ask you if the mentioned thread might have a right to get reopened: like we all know we're here, and we use Opera, and also we use some other browsers and wouldn't mind touching some issues about them not leaving this place. In the Lounge. -
gustavwiz last edited by
I agree, but perhaps it shouldn't be named "Firefox Tinkering", because it should involve other browsers as well.
It's not that I don't trust you, but do you have any link to those statements? I just want to see that.
-
sgunhouse Moderator Volunteer last edited by
Too bad we don't have a Software forum any more.
Knowing you. Josh, you probably asked "How can I get Firefox to ..." and one of the other mods said "This isn't a Firefox support forum - ask them" and closed the thread. I do see a point there. If you want to post a thread saying "This is what I did to make Firefox more like Presto" or maybe "Recommended extensions for Firefox?" that should be fine, but we don't do tech support for non-Opera products (they have their own tech support).
-
A Former User last edited by
Gustavwiz, http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-no-longer-works-some-versions-windows-xp.
I see your points, dudes. Still, one thread per each other browser in a lounge is not too inappropriate - for Opera users not wanting to move/shift to another support forum/site /browser.
-
blackbird71 last edited by
Just visited Firefox's support site today, and I noticed in one case, they officially suggest certain users to install Opera - and they have a link to that.
So why?
I'm about some parity here. ...FYI (and for some perspective), Firefox 13 was the first FF version that required XP-SP2 or greater and was released in June 2012. Consequently, the material in that Mozilla support page ( http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-no-longer-works-some-versions-windows-xp ) dates to mid-2012 as well. At that time, Presto Opera was the only Opera desktop browser in existence, so the Opera referral in the page was to the then-current Presto version, for XP users running SP1 or lower. Note that the referral was not a "recommendation" of Opera as a browser brand per se, but instead just a "courtesy" link posting of a possible alternate browser still (then) being developed for users of old systems (XP-SP1 or lower) to try... coupled with warnings to users of dangers in running either old FF or Windows versions. "Parity" for Opera would be a support web page simply recommending that users of WinXP-SP1 or lower who could not use Blink Opera might consider using Presto Opera or Firefox 12 versions or lower... coupled with copious warnings that using old browsers and OS's has major risks.
I'm unaware of Mozilla forum threads that are dedicated to discussing the best methods of tweaking non-Mozilla browsers.
-
A Former User last edited by
For your consideration, I'm using v.12.0 for now*:)*
(People say v.38 hogs a lot, etc.)