Posts made by tnowak

@cratte Because it didn't happen to me after setting "Level = 0" (in the top right corner of the dialog) and running the extension on some trusted websites.

Default value of "Level = 1" means that resources from linked websites are accessed, and (for me) it always triggers warnings about tracking domains.

@cratte It looks like all these warnings come from downloading tracking pixels placed on the website where you activated the extension.

Can you check this?

@arielcamino Hi Ariel, extensions need to fulfil Acceptance Criteria:
https://dev.opera.com/extensions/acceptance-criteria/

@sitenkov The name of the extension says about 40% cash back, and on one of the screenshots you say about 50%. Which one is true?

@eduardo-mior It's https://addons.opera.com/developer/

@eduardo-mior Hi Eduardo! Ask for that in the extension developer portal ("Wall"). The moderation team can transfer extensions.

@antilopa Did you take a look at https://dev.opera.com/extensions/acceptance-criteria/?

@fdauti Please see https://forums.opera.com/topic/42397/extension-upgrade-requires-additional-permissions/141.

@LarryH The version in Opera Addons is much older, from 22 Apr 2015.
Could you contact the author with https://flareget.com/support and ask for an update?
I will remove the extension for now and ask the developer for an update by email.

@commaticus

1. Unused files in the last package you submitted:

    → find -type f -size 0
    ./site/removelisting.js
    ./noconcat/1_sth/obj.js
    ./all/script.js
   

2. Could you please provide links to these files on the official websites? I can only find ones with a comment containing the version number on the first line.

@burnout426
Libraries need to be byte for byte exact copies, so SHA-256 hash comparison can be used to check that.

@oktools : Thanks!

@signalhire : Your extension contains obfuscated or minified scripts.
Please take a look at https://dev.opera.com/extensions/acceptance-criteria/

@oktools : We asked you to update links in the description to use HTTPS.

@kurtq : That's why the old version was rejected
And the review of the newest version is in progress.

@commaticus : Let's start with:

• "There must be no unused files."
• "Well-known third-party libraries must be in a genuine and in an unchanged form. They should be acquired from the vendor’s official website or a CDN."

@adsfactory-russia: It's OK, but don't mix languages in different fields.
I see that you are discussing the rest of issues with our moderation team.

@brainierweb:
Our moderation queue is integrated with the points system mentioned by @tprockow. We are in the process of fine-tuning its parameters to give priority to good or popular extensions, yours included. It should be much better now.

@brainierweb:
Your extension didn't use i18n, so the description in Russian was recognized as English. It would be great if you included some description in English too.
https://developer.chrome.com/apps/i18n

Published.

@kurtq : Upgrade your jQuery to a version without vulnerabilities.
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11358