OLD IS GOLD, we want new opera with all old stuff
-
A Former User last edited by admin
Rafaelluik, I agree with you totally. Having programmed for many, many years (now out of it) there is no reason why what is good in 12-16 can not come back --- and if some things slow down 20 --- let them be options, add-ons or extenstions that a user can choose. See my post 20: Needs "Insert Personal", drag-and-drop-to-desktop & large matrix speed-dial many columns-rows at https://forums.opera.com/topic/2005/20-needs-insert-personal-drag-and-drop-to-desktop-large-matrix-speed-dial-many-columns-rows/2 sorry for name misspelling.
Do you have any idea how to do any of these things? Thanks.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Currently IE6 is more customizable than Opera 20.
They need to go back and recreate the drag and drop buttons of the old UI, but I see the current culture at opera is leaning more towards the fisher price walled garden approach than giving people the creative choice to make it their own. I find that really sad.It's not going to happen. Some things may be returned but not all. Opera 15+ will never be Opera Presto and users need to get this idea firmly planted. Pesala put a link into another thread which is valuable to read in order to better inform yourself of WHERE Opera is now headed:
http://blogs.opera.com/desktop/2013/07/the-vision-behind-opera-15-and-beyond/That link is bunk and basically tells us that Opera is heading down the wrong path.
-
Deleted User last edited by
There is a reason for this.... http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365692,00.asp
Opera should be #1 but it never will be using Chromium.
-
havokdan last edited by
There is a reason for this.... http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365692,00.asp
Opera should be #1 but it never will be using Chromium.With the presto, certainly would not either.
-
A Former User last edited by
There is a reason for this.... http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2365692,00.asp
Opera should be #1 but it never will be using Chromium.That review in the link does seem quite positive towards Opera. At least with Blink behind Opera it has a chance to gain more popularity and, more importantly, give the Opera team a reason to continue producing a browser.
-
Deleted User last edited by
As long as Opera uses Chromium it will fail. There can only be one Google Chrome Browser. For Opera to copy it is a disgrace.
-
lem729 last edited by
Thanks for sharing that, cozza. I thought the article was reasonable
although Opera, with its king of speed dials -- is, in my humble opinion, better that the review. On Off-Road mode, they ran some very convoluted websites to test it, and it (Off Road mode) limited the data the browser took in, and Opera performed significantly better than the other browsers. So that mode is a positive feature -- particularly for people with laptops who try to surf on a wifi connection that may not be that strong. Just as an aside, the Opera Browser for Android (Opera 20) also has an Off-Road Mode. -
Deleted User last edited by
As long as Opera uses Chromium it will fail. There can only be one Google Chrome Browser. For Opera to copy it is a disgrace.
Opera is not copying Chrome. The devs are developing their own browser. BElieve it or not they are heading to the right way.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Indeed... Opera IS heading in the right direction and will undoubtedly gain new users in the process. A week back Bruce Lawson wrote a nice piece on Opera Blink's first birthday. Catch it here:
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/happy-first-birthday-to-blink/
-
awzx last edited by
The devs are developing their own browser.
It doesn't look like they really are. The actual facts show that there is very little to no progress whatsoever with Chropera, just as not a lot of differences between Chrome and Opera 20. Or at least let's say between Opera 20 and Yandex Browser/Coolnovo/Torch/whatever other Chromium-forked browser.
-
Deleted User last edited by
The devs are developing their own browser.
It doesn't look like they really are. The actual facts show that there is very little to no progress whatsoever with Chropera, just as not a lot of differences between Chrome and Opera 20. Or at least let's say between Opera 20 and Yandex Browser/Coolnovo/Torch/whatever other Chromium-forked browser.
Wrong... but then, why doesn't that surprise me.
First off, there is no Chropera. If I put that into a search engine, nothing substantial comes up other than the crazy imaginings of whiners and complainers. I can find Chrome, Chromium, Safari, Firefox, Seamonkey, Internet Explorer, Opera and several other lesser-known browsers but no Chropera. Sorry... you're mistaken on several counts.
-
Deleted User last edited by
The devs are developing their own browser.
It doesn't look like they really are. The actual facts show that there is very little to no progress whatsoever with Chropera, just as not a lot of differences between Chrome and Opera 20. Or at least let's say between Opera 20 and Yandex Browser/Coolnovo/Torch/whatever other Chromium-forked browser.
Wrong... but then, why doesn't that surprise me.
First off, there is no Chropera. If I put that into a search engine, nothing substantial comes up other than the crazy imaginings of whiners and complainers. I can find Chrome, Chromium, Safari, Firefox, Seamonkey, Internet Explorer, Opera and several other lesser-known browsers but no Chropera. Sorry... you're mistaken on several counts.I must agree with you
-
berng last edited by
The devs are developing their own browser.
It doesn't look like they really are. The actual facts show that there is very little to no progress whatsoever with Chropera, just as not a lot of differences between Chrome and Opera 20. Or at least let's say between Opera 20 and Yandex Browser/Coolnovo/Torch/whatever other Chromium-forked browser.
Wrong... but then, why doesn't that surprise me.
First off, there is no Chropera. If I put that into a search engine, nothing substantial comes up other than the crazy imaginings of whiners and complainers. I can find Chrome, Chromium, Safari, Firefox, Seamonkey, Internet Explorer, Opera and several other lesser-known browsers but no Chropera. Sorry... you're mistaken on several counts.Chropera is that word made up by whiners. They think they are so clever when they use "Chropera." The maturity of 3 year olds.
-
awzx last edited by
@leushino
there is no Chropera
Sure there is... Chropera is that joke some humorists came up with, the one that tries to look like good old Opera browser and utilize its name yet de-facto has nothin really to do with it. Well maybe that's not Chropera, but sure as hell that's not Opera neither.
-
chuckergreg last edited by
I've been using opera for about a decade and a half. I've been an avid spokesman for using it, converting others. Opera has always been about being at the forefront of novel features. I've used the heck out of:
Tabbed browsing (since the onset)
Sessions (this is brilliant) and its associated history
Undo (whoops, didn't mean to close that tab!) - also brilliant
Single-key browsing (why is this off by default in the last releases up to 12!??!!!!)
Right-click "close all but active"
Amazing crash recovery (continue from where I left off)
Efficient memory use (seems to be dead already by Opera 12, though)
Eventually, speed dial.And, of course, this whole time I used bookmarks.
I loved Presto for many reasons but #1 because it wasn't the browser in the cross-hairs of hackers (and wasn't a product of Google).
This new Opera is everything I could possibly hate in a browser and is simply not Opera. It's a disgrace to even call it "Opera". It should be another product name.
I'm stuck on Opera 12 / Presto until either (1) It becomes so grossly incompatible that it's useless for day-to-day work --or-- (2) The new "Opera" adds back in 90% of what made Opera great.
The only thing great really going for me is that a huge amount of sites I visit are, by nature, unlikely to adopt the latest standards and thus will remain compatible with Presto for a long time.
Plain and simple, the new Opera alienates its existing users and makes absolutely no compelling case for anyone else to switch to it. Bringing back the old features like the ones I've listed isn't a "should", it's a "must".
My questions is, does dropping Presto really require dropping all these features? If so, Opera is 5 minutes past flat-lined on a cool day. Either defibrillate Opera 12 before the brain damage sets in, or call it DOA. 'cause right now it's headed straight to hell.
-
opieuser last edited by
There are always going to be fanboys, and stooges (who usually work FOR the company) posting opinions online flaming those who aren't happy with the latest, not-necessarily-greatest product. There are also going to be disgruntled users and stooges working for opposing products badmouthing the current product. I still feel compelled to express my opinion about opera. I started using so long ago (1998? 1999?) I don't remember the version. It was streamlined, loaded MUCH faster than internet exploiter, and had some great features. Unfortunately it seems as if the latest versions have been introducing changes just for the sake of change, or to make it easier to support more changes in the future. I saw a post somewhere claiming that 95% of opera users dont use bookmarks, which I find extremely hard to believe. I'm staying on 12 because I DO use bookmarks. Of course there are other reasons, too many to list, but the fake statistic justifying the removal of bookmarks is a great example of why many aren't happy with the direction opera is taking. Im not going to call it "Nope-era", like some have done. I just think whomever is deciding upon the direction this browser is taking may want to consider at least leaving the functionality of some of the features of older browswers. Have them disabled by default, but allow us to re-enable them.
-
Deleted User last edited by
@leushino
there is no Chropera
Sure there is... Chropera is that joke some humorists came up with, the one that tries to look like good old Opera browser and utilize its name yet de-facto has nothin really to do with it. Well maybe that's not Chropera, but sure as hell that's not Opera neither.
You appear to be in the wrong forum. I think you'll be much happier in a Mozilla forum. Just remember to try and be positive over there or you'll be as appreciated as you are here.
-
Deleted User last edited by
to adopt the latest standards and thus will remain compatible with Presto for a long time.
Plain and simple, the new Opera alienates its existing users and makes absolutely no compelling case for anyone else to switch to it. Bringing back the old features like the ones I've listed isn't a "should", it's a "must".
My questions is, does dropping Presto really require dropping all these features? If so, Opera is 5 minutes past flat-lined on a cool day. Either defibrillate Opera 12 before the brain damage sets in, or call it DOA. 'cause right now it's headed straight to hell.Actually, you're incorrect. The new Opera alienates "some" of its former user base and most of those have had the good sense to move on to something else. If you have questions regarding features that have been dropped by the developers, ask THEM. They are the only ones who can give you a definitive answer. They seldom visit these forums which are meant to help users of Opera with the browser.
-
leocg Moderator Volunteer last edited by
Indeed... Opera IS heading in the right direction and will undoubtedly gain new users in the process. A week back Bruce Lawson wrote a nice piece on Opera Blink's first birthday. Catch it here:
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/happy-first-birthday-to-blink/Blink birthday not Opera Blink one.
-
vedicaudio last edited by
@blackbird71
So I finally tried installing v12.14 and the first site it crashed on was this very website: the Opera forums.
I guess sometimes you just can't win. Maybe I'll just stop browsing the internet completely. Seems to cause too many headaches these days.
