Do more on the web, with a fast and secure browser!
Download Opera browser with:
@hien-reese +1 for Chrome-style tab grouping.
The code is presumably public and all that needs to happen is to adapt it to Opera's style.
Even with workspaces, it's still handy to have (sub)grouping. I literally have a dozen or more contexts of tabs. I don't want a dozen workspaces. I want to subdivide workspaces into groups of tabs occasionally.
https://blog.google/products/chrome/manage-tabs-with-google-chrome/
@leocg said:
@davidgould said in Opera 84.0.4316.0 developer update:
Lastly, can we have a setting to stop giving small extensions their own thread?
That's how Chromium works, so Google would need to change it.
Ahh yes, was too busy remembering problems and forgot.
There are apparently some options in Chromium. None do what I want but might play with it anyway.
https://superuser.com/questions/654565/how-to-run-google-chrome-in-a-single-process
Without extensions, I'm consistenly having a "Please wait" forever bug in low memory situations. Hitting the Back arrow is enough to cause it.
Killing a whole bunch of threads is enough to bring Opera back to life (the state where every tab shows the "out of memory" screen).
@leocg said in Opera 96.0.4674.0 developer update:
@davidgould Got a Tinder page with a create an account button.
Disabling my extensions didn't help.
Neither did Ctrl-F5 and deleting cookies. I had to go into Settings and delete anything that looked like site data (only site-wide cookies via an extension for that).
By the way, it would be nice if Opera Developer at least had a function to easily load in a clean mode.
Thanks again, Leo.
Tinder web broke a while back. Works in Edge. I don't imagine it's any of my extensions. Can someone test it quickly please?
If you see the "Catch us on the flip side" screen, that's broken. If you see a login screen or something like Tinder, that's working. Let me know please.
Upgrading to this version caused Opera's memory management bug again. This bug makes the tab threads take up ~50% more memory. There may be an increase in the main threads (esp browser & GPU) too.
What's different is that eventually ie after 30 mins, the memory management has worked and everything looks relatively normal again. It would presumably take less than 30 mins if the system wasn't swapping like crazy.
Having used Opera for around 30 years now, I'm very sensitive to such large changes in memory usage. I have little doubt that overwriting the installation with the previous version will fix the problem but I'll hold off for 24 hours in case someone wants to investigate it. I know from previous threads that I'm not the only one with this problem.
@ralf-brinkmann said in Opera 92 developer:
@davidgould, what do you mean with "binaries folder"?
eg C:\Users\User\AppData\Local\Programs\Opera developer\92.0.4519.0
Whatever I did helped, but it still sucks. Opera isn't releasing memory fast enough on demand (by itself or other programs). So there may be a problem since 91.0.4514. Going to delete this and 92*binaries folders and reinstall 91.0.4498. The release after was probably fine but getting tired of this problem.
@davidgould said:
@ralf-brinkmann: I have memory problems again.
For the record, I was using the previous 9.1 version, upgraded from the one before that. Used Setup version of 92 Dev stream and so far so good..
I used to be able to edit comments on here.
@ralf-brinkmann: I have memory problems again.
Last time, it was fixed by a reinstallation. Rename the binaries folder and try that.
I;m about to do it myself.
https://get.geo.opera.com/ftp/pub/opera-developer/
About to try it myself.
Problems when instlaling script from https://www.fbpurity.com/install.htm.
The script is installed and running but Tampermonkey doesn't show it as running. Yes, Tampermonkey is running a script that the dashboard doesn't know about. It may be causing problems in updating the script too.
Cool extension though.
This version has much greater memory usage or worse memory management or deprecates the low thread count flag I use. Haven't tested without extensions.
Reverting to 4470.
@davidgould: You might want to try using this in your social media ads. It has some viral potential.