+1
I agree for many of the same reasons as given above.
Latest posts made by berng
- Suggestions and feature requests
-
RE: Disable the hearts menu?Opera for Windows
Will stash be retained in future Opera versions if bookmarks are removed?
I just use the bookmarks bar and stash. I don't need the "new" bookmarks. I want to keep stash.
-
RE: RIP Stash, and long live bookmarks!Opera for Windows
I would agree, but at the moment it's one or the other.
I know. I already pointed that out last week internally, but nobody seemed to care.Another shoot myself in the foot by Opera.
-
RE: What percentage of people are adapting well to the new Opera?Opera for Windows
I don't care what it feels like to you. The company is doing very well whether you like it or not. it's a little early to say their doing pretty well. bloomberg reports they had a first quarter loss in 2014. Link? Their 1Q2014 shows a profit. Their revenue increased 40% over 1Q2013. http://www.operasoftware.com/company/investors/finance
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/earnings/earnings.asp?ticker=OPERA:NO
-0.12. not +. hover on the link for interpretation.
That minus means a negative from the ANALYST ESTIMATES. They have a profit of .12. If there was a loss, then the bar would be pointing pointing downwards from the zero point with the color being red instead of green.
without getting into this to far (it's off topic and boring), they did not have a first quarter profit. their earnings did not compensate their expenditures. there is an § Adjusted EBITDA of MUSD 22.7 that is burried in opera's cost presentation. this graph highlights it. actual earnings of 0.12 equates to "a negative surprise" for the first quarter of "-75.78%". that is why opera's price fell .6 after this announcement.
the point was, it is still early to say that the new direction will be a profitable one.It may be off topic but you're the one who started this with your incorrect comment "it's a little early to say their doing pretty well. bloomberg reports they had a first quarter loss in 2014."
There was NO loss. They had a profit.
-
RE: What percentage of people are adapting well to the new Opera?Opera for Windows
I don't care what it feels like to you. The company is doing very well whether you like it or not.
it's a little early to say their doing pretty well. bloomberg reports they had a first quarter loss in 2014.
Link?
Their 1Q2014 shows a profit. Their revenue increased 40% over 1Q2013.
http://www.operasoftware.com/company/investors/financehttp://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/earnings/earnings.asp?ticker=OPERA:NO
-0.12. not +. hover on the link for interpretation.
That minus means a negative from the ANALYST ESTIMATES. They have a profit of .12. If there was a loss, then the bar would be pointing pointing downwards from the zero point with the color being red instead of green.
-
RE: What percentage of people are adapting well to the new Opera?Opera for Windows
I don't care what it feels like to you. The company is doing very well whether you like it or not.
it's a little early to say their doing pretty well. bloomberg reports they had a first quarter loss in 2014.
Link?
Their 1Q2014 shows a profit. Their revenue increased 40% over 1Q2013.
http://www.operasoftware.com/company/investors/financehttp://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/earnings/earnings.asp?ticker=OPERA:NO
Your link shows a .12 per share PROFIT.
-
RE: What percentage of people are adapting well to the new Opera?Opera for Windows
I don't care what it feels like to you. The company is doing very well whether you like it or not.
it's a little early to say their doing pretty well. bloomberg reports they had a first quarter loss in 2014.
Link?
Their financial report for 1Q2014 shows a profit. Their revenue increased 40% over 1Q2013.
http://www.operasoftware.com/company/investors/finance
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/earnings/earnings.asp?ticker=OPERA:NO
-
RE: Will Opera be supported on Window XPOpera for Windows
Originally posted by artmil:Originally posted by leushino:Remaining with an OS that is more than a decade old is simply foolish "if" you can afford to move forward. If you can't... well... there's really no option.I agree withe the first part... but windows is not the only operating system. Depending on the usage you can have a faster, more secure, reliable and up to date system for free. True. I also learned today from the WW show that support for Windows 7 will cease in March of 2015 (that's only two years). Whether MS will choose to extend it or not remains unclear. The point is, if you are debating purchasing a new Windows computer, buying a Windows 7 system might not be the wisest choice. According to the sources, the start menu is being added back to the Windows 8 OS just a few months from now and the fact that Windows 8 "is" a more secure OS than Windows 7 is sort of a no-brainer since you can now boot directly to the desktop.
Win 7 support ends 1/14/2020.
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/search/default.aspx?alpha=windows+7
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy
By then one can safely upgrade from Win 7 to Win 9. It seems every other Win release is a bit of a dud.
-
RE: v21 vs v20? Stable yet?Opera for Windows
Nothing has been added or improved since version 15. All that's happened is the version number has increased by +1 every few weeks.
Really? Either you're trying to create controversy by lying or you are too stupid to have seen the many very obvious changes since 15.
So are you trolling or just plain stupid?
-
RE: How do I make Opera quit nagging me about updates?Opera for Windows
For the new Opera add the following Environment System Variable to Windows:
OPERA_AUTOUPDATE_DISABLED as the variable
Anything such as 'c' as the value