This is how you're going to save Opera
-
-
Deleted User last edited by
Opera is doing well and it is an amazing browser. I wonder if the devs had changed to Webkit earlier. How would be today?
-
A Former User last edited by
Which of the two different browsers did you mean, Sidney?
What a confusion, isn't it, Sidney? -
-
-
diamondtiara last edited by
I'm just saying, when you make a software that is an alternative to
- ie, a preinstalled piece of junk
- the official chrome, a botnet and
- mozilla
You have to reconsider what you're doing because I still think Opera has potential and it must not turn into abandonware.
Functionality isn't that bad, even if I remember using opera 9 for years and it was more complete, email and various plugins.
I'm talking about aesthetics and I'm explaining what could be easily improved. Opera 9 by example supported a lot of skins of all kind created by artists, from Deviantart or others.
Now it's like if you compare what Ubuntu or Windows used to be: a true OS becoming a minimalist junk for tablets with little or no personality or taste.
I still use Opera9 for some applications. No way I'm going to overwrite it with that chromium clone. If I wanted Chrome, I'd install it.
-
-
-
Deleted User last edited by
I go back to version 3 which was released in 1999. At the time I ran it opposite Netscape.I don't recall what I paid for it, but pay I did. In truth, I paid for my first version of Netscape (Netscape Gold 3.0) but that is back in 97.
I personally like the look of Opera now. It's clean and it does not need a bunch of dumb skins to mess it up. And those who think it is a clone of Google Chrome do not know what they're talking about.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Appearance customization would be great, but I think there's more pressing issues, like the broken font rendering, or the myriad of missing features.
-
Deleted User last edited by
The missing features are slowly being added back into the new browser. I agree that the font rendering needs to be addressed. Aesthetic considerations are the least important factors at this juncture and I continue to re-iterate: Opera does not need "saving". It's doing perfectly well.
-
A Former User last edited by
The missing features are slowly being added back into the new browser.
First, you're right - it's a new browser.
Though the adding is peculiarly slow... However - if we do not consider the versions'/releases' number, the time period doesn't seem especially vast.:rolleyes: -
sablatnic last edited by
I especially miss one bookmark feature; 'open all elements in folder', which opens all elements in a subfolder under bookmarks. (Main reason for still using series 12 Opera)!
Will it come "back"?
-
leocg Moderator Volunteer last edited by
I especially miss one bookmark feature; 'open all elements in folder', which opens all elements in a subfolder under bookmarks. (Main reason for still using series 12 Opera)!
Will it come "back"?Maybe: http://blogs.opera.com/desktop/2014/10/share-bookmarks-opera-beta-26/#comment-1658057743
-
sablatnic last edited by
No, but thanks?
Anyone know how to sort bookmarks and sub folders alphabetically?
No, screw it. Sticking with series 12 and Exploder!
-
A Former User last edited by admin
See here -
https://forums.opera.com/topic/6167/opera-12-and-opera-26/5
-
