Save as MHTML adding suspect content to the file.
-
A Former User last edited by
@leocg Exactly! And that appearance is altered respect to the original page with ads, so why not save the page altered as is being displayed?
When a section is removed from a page by the adblocker, its space is not reserved in the displayed page, so the page appeareance is altered. This new page layout is what it should be saved...exactly what is displayed... with the ad links directly eliminated and tha ads space eliminated or reduced as displayed.
Maybe there is something I am missing because this sound so obvious for me...sorry.
-
A Former User last edited by
@burnout426 said in Save as MHTML adding suspect content to the file.:
@disappointeduser said in Save as MHTML adding suspect content to the file.:
my attention is that "<=" after the "</style>" tag.
The '<' is the starting bracket for the LINK element on the next line. The '=' and the newline after it is just breaking up things into another line to meet line-length limits.
It is not....it looks it belongs to the </head> tag.
So the same question is still around. Is it compliant with the standard to break the head tag inserting a "=" sign plus CRLF just before "/head>". The "=" sign is supposed to replace non printable caracter followed by its hex code, so if any it should be something like:<=OD=OA
/head>Am I wrong?
-
-
burnout426 Volunteer last edited by
@disappointeduser said in Save as MHTML adding suspect content to the file.:
It is not....it looks it belongs to the </head> tag.
Which part of the source that you previously posted are you referring to then?
As sgunhouse said though, '=' at the end of a line (as in, '=' + raw CR + raw LF) is okay. It's like a soft wrap that can happen right in the middle of an open tag or end tag etc. When the quoted-printable is decoded, it'll be put back together.
