The impending demise of Opera?
-
-
-
A Former User last edited by
Are you sure ?
Yes, he/she clearly mentions dealing with tabs (not with different browsers). -
lem729 last edited by
I did notice where Chrookmarks in the Chrome store is a bookmark manager that lets you organize your bookmarks alphabetically and chronologically, or so one of the commenters on the app says. I haven't tried it, but it looks like a possibility for you if you want more than just organizing alphabetically.
-
werewolf last edited by
@nightmaresoul,
I did notice where Chrookmarks in the Chrome store is a bookmark manager that lets you organize your bookmarks alphabetically and chronologically, or so one of the commenters on the app says. I haven't tried it, but it looks like a possibility for you if you want more than just organizing alphabetically.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chrookmarks-chrome-bookma/kcdheengilgkagjehknnnofigbmlnnfj?hl=en-USI just want a bookmark panel that STAYS OPEN on the left side of my screen, like Opera 12 and previous had, and like Firefox still has.
-
rabbitkillrun last edited by
There still aren't bookmarks? I was one of the many complaining about this when Opera Next first came out and several people told me that it was coming soon. If it's been this long and they still haven't added even that back in, I'm severely doubting I'll ever be switching to it.
-
lem729 last edited by
There's tons of bookmarking in Opera 20, so much bookmarking you can get dizzy with it. There's an abundance of riches in the bookmarking, so please, don't confuse people. You can bookmark in the Speed Dial (huge amounts, because you can create folders), bookmark in the personal toolbar huge amounts, use bookmark manager extensions. As I mentioned to nightmaresoul in this thread, I use Chrookmarks from the Chrome store, and it's pretty good. I already posted a link to it for him, so you can easily find it.
And one person was telling me that they had 1000 bookmarks alone in Stash. Now I personally wouldn't do that with Stash (but there are so many other places to do it), but certainly there's incredible amounts of bookmarking that can be done in Opera 20 if you take some time to learn Opera 20. More Bookmarking is possible in Opera 20 (because of the voluminous space in the Speed Dial (with folders) than in Opera 12.17.
By the way @werewolf, I see where there's even an extension called, Bookmark Side Panel in the Chrome Store. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/bookmarks-side-panel/ankkfflbgjokclfgfehiinnlijdlicdb?hl=en-US
Now I'm not recommending it. I have no idea about it, but panels are at least being worked on as extensions.
-
90soperahippie last edited by
Isn't Opera for everyone who has tried Chrome and finds fault?
Chome is a joke and example of Open Source failure. It freezes my 8 gig ram, quad core machine...Contantly!
The cache is NOT controllable. The rendering is slow. It takes chrome 2 minutes to initialize. Everything done poorly.
Opera, oth, has had some bad versions. But on whole is much more of a rock. Not as dumbed down as Chrome. Open source loves to rip out features and improvements for a the stupidest user base.
-
werewolf last edited by
@rabbitkillrun
...
By the way @werewolf, I see where there's even an extension called, Bookmark Side Panel in the Chrome Store. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/bookmarks-side-panel/ankkfflbgjokclfgfehiinnlijdlicdb?hl=en-US
Now I'm not recommending it. I have no idea about it, but panels are at least being worked on as extensions.Unfortunately it gets very bad reviews. But at least someone is working on it. Many people want it. Opera's bookmark side panel used to be especially nice because I could simply click on the left margin to open or close the side panel.
-
lem729 last edited by
@werewold
The side panels have a nice aesthetic look, and give you a pleasing vertical layout of bookmarks. Perhaps, the panels slow the brower down. Or take a lot of complex programming. I'm a bit of an ignoramus there, ;))) I do think that if they could be done easily and without impairing browser performance, we'd have them In Opera Blink. But an improvement in the extension ability to do this is likely because there is demand. I think the new paradign for Opera is to keep browser lean and fast and rely on developers to give extensions for the rest.
Still, all may not be lost.
for a short term adjustment, waiting for . . . .( as for Godot, haha the sidebar), you can a nice vertical layout of bookmarks (but you do need to click on a toolbar icon for the extension to get that vertical layout, if you use something like Chrookmarks or Tidy Bookmars) (from the Chrome store), and there are other possibilities there that I haven't checked out. I like Chrookmarks because you can order it either chronologically or alphabetically, it sets out folders first, and makes them easy to manage. One makes adjustments . . . Not everything is as before (change involves initially pluses and minuses), but it can be liveable on the way to . . . why, (like Godot) . . . everything is coming up roses. A song. Lol. -
wfheller last edited by
I have been using Opera since Windows 3.1 and I had to pay for it. I have also payed for versions 4, 5, 6 until it became free with version 7. That is why I hate the chromium version since opera 15. I have currently version 20 on my laptop but rarely use it because it is just a Chrome clone but one without bookmarks and no mouse gestures that can compare with versio 12.16 which is my standard browser. I hve transported my bookmarks to Firefox and Safari and even IE with Transmute.
But i hpoe that in the near future the guys in norway have seen their error and make an Opera with bookmarks and complete mouse gestures including the ability to redefine most used commands to one letter abreveations. I think that jrista is absolutely right in his complaint and I agree with it 100%. -
wfheller last edited by
Using the Microsoft Internals program Process Explorer I find that both Chrome and Opera20 use a gigantic amount of storage both working set and private bytes - they add up to about 3 times the size of Opera12.16. And why is it necesary to start 8 subthreaths when Opera12 uses only one for the plugin-wrapper.
-
berng last edited by
I have been using Opera since Windows 3.1 and I had to pay for it. I have also payed for versions 4, 5, 6 until it became free with version 7. That is why I hate the chromium version since opera 15.
I really don't understand what paying for very early versions of Opera (4,5,6) has to do with hating Chromium versions.
-
lem729 last edited by
@wheller.
Opera 20 is absolutely not a browser without bookmarks. Where do you come up with something like that. I mean if people repeat something over and over again, it does not make it true. It's nonsense. Absolute, and total. Opera 20 has tons and tons of bookmarking -- from in the Speed Dial (with folders), to the Personal bookmarks toolbar to, Stash to bookmarking extensions in both the Opera and Chrome extension stores. It has more bookmarking possibilities than probably any browser on the market, and cerainly more than IE, Firefox, and Chrome (all of which I have on my computer and tested). I'll take Opera 20 for bookmarking any day. I can listen to and understand other gripes, but this one is beyond ridiculous,
-
lem729 last edited by
Isn't Opera for everyone who has tried Chrome and finds fault? Chome is a joke and example of Open Source failure. It freezes my 8 gig ram, quad core machine...Contantly!
The cache is NOT controllable. The rendering is slow. It takes chrome 2 minutes to initialize. Everything done poorly.
Opera, oth, has had some bad versions. But on whole is much more of a rock. Not as dumbed down as Chrome. Open source loves to rip out features and improvements for a the stupidest user base.You have a point. :))) I have a strange situation, where I hardly use Chrome, I use Opera 20, but I get messages on my computer (from my Norton software) every now and then of huge CPU use (95 percent on one CPU or something like that) coming from the Chrome browser. I haven't even opened the browser on my computer. Now I did have a check in my settings there -- "continue running background apps when Google Chrome is closed." I don't know what those background apps are, but they sure have been running my computer into the ground. I have taken the check out. What kind of background apps could eat up so much of my CPU. Hopefully taking the check out, will solve the problem. If I still get the CPU messages, I may have to uninstall Chrome.
-
werewolf last edited by
Lem729 -
Again -
I just want a bookmark panel that STAYS OPEN on the left side of my screen, like Opera 12 and previous had, and like Firefox still has.
So that I can click on any one of my numerous bookmarks easily with one step.
Is this option so difficult to achieve with Chrome type browsers? It was available for many years on just about all of the earlier browsers.
-
wfheller last edited by
lem729
I have about 2600 bookmarks [give or take a hundred] in 17 directories in Opera12 - that is converted to speeddial that takes longer to load than Opera20 itself. That is why I want de normal bookmarks back.
-
lem729 last edited by
I deal with your bookmarks in the second, third and fourth paragraphs, but in my humble opinion, don't put the vast bulk of them in the speed dial;). 2600! Ughhh. The speed dial can hold them, but I'd hate to clutter it with too much. And I think all of the thumbnails - so many -- may slow it down, even loading from cache. For the Speed dial, it's super to emphasize some of your best that you go to all the time. I have maybe twelve folders (up to ten things in a folder, sometimes less, and 10 indivdual items, not in folders. It only takes up half the page of my speed dial. In one folder i have a lot of music -- Pandora, Slacker, Tunein Radio, etc. In another I have video and TV sites -- YouTube, DailyMotion.Com, etc. In a third, General News with many ten items in it, Another folder for Sports, etcetera. (But still, my Speed Dial holds a lot more for a display (and very easy access) without destroying the wallpaper/background, than I could ever do with a traditional Speed Dial without folders). Each to his own, but let me urge you not to use so much of the Speed Dial that you make it ugly. Make the speed dial beautiful. Give it great wallpaper (which you can personalize by using your own jpgs from your computer if you choose) and use some of the Opera themes. You can also right click jpgs on the internet, and turn them immediately into wallpaper. The Speed Dial is your home page. A home, you make beautiful. I even adjust the number of columns I'm using whenever I put in new wallpaper, so as not to block nice things in the Speed Dial. I sometimes use four columns, sometimes 6 or 7 for the Speed Dial. Now of course, you can do what you did, but I think it would be bad :(( so I understand your telling me that it is. Think about, for you, wfheller, the things you go to the most often!!! Emphasize them with Speed Dial inclusion. Surely ;))))) you don't go to 2600 bookmarks equally and all the time.
Now for the important part. Put the mass of bookmarks in the Personal Bookmarks toolbar. It can make normal bookmarks. Lol. Make sure in Settings, Browser, etc. you activated it. It will go across the top of the browser toolbar, and when it reaches the end, moves down vertically. I think there's room, because at the end it moves down vertically. Because you have so many bookmarks, you need to play with your folders a little, maybe. But it should be able to make folders within folders, so I think you can organize, and it would be much better than on the speed dial. You can click on an empty space in the toolbar to create a new folder. You need to know how to make new bookmarks on the toolbar -- dragging the icon (?) of the website -- all the way to the left of the address bar -- to the personal toolbar, or dragging a link from the Speed Dial to the personal toolbar.
By the way there's no limit to what you can put in Stash. Someone told me they had 1000 bookmarks there. There's a search engine that can go through it. I want to explore myself making better the use of it -- at least the right use for me. Though I would emphasize for the vast bulk of your bookmarks, the Personal Bookmarks toolbar (which is also a more traditional display). I think it will work for you.
Also before you do the bulk of your organzing, download a bookmarks manager extension. I use Chrookmarks for Chrome. There are others that are possible too. Tidy Bookmarks for Chrome is reasonable. (There may be one called Pretty Bookmarks? that some people tout). To get a Chrome extension, you need to download the Opera extension, "Download Chrome Extension", and then you should be good to go ;)))) And good luck!!!!!
-
lem729 last edited by
@wheller
On organizing your bookmarks into folders, I have the extension Chrookmarks for Chrome, and it works well for me.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chrookmarks-chrome-bookma/kcdheengilgkagjehknnnofigbmlnnfj?hl=enIf you click on the Chrookmarks icon on the Personal toolbar, you get a vertical display of your bookmarks. If you right click on a folder, you get the option to make a new folder. If you right click on that new folder, you get a vertical option to create inside it a new folder, and on and on. Now those folders that you create show up on Personal Bookmarks bar (that you no doubt activated by going to Settings/Browser, and put a dot in the place to activate it).
Without Chrookmarks, if you right click on a folder in the personal bookmarks bar, you don't get that option to create a folder in the folder (which is a bit of a nit/flaw) (only redeemed because of the extension.. I'm not saying Chrookmarks is the only Bookmarks manager extension that gives you the ability to create folders within folders, but it's the only one I have on my computer to test right now. Since you have 2400 bookmarks, the ability to create folders within folders is essential. What I'm saying is that you can do it.
-
wfheller last edited by
So I will have to cleanup in the bookmarks I collected over the last 20 years and probably there are a lot non existent today.
But the other problem remains that the number of mouse-gestures are decreased and I cannot assign one letter commands to existing commands that require either Ctr or Alt. I am a keyboard user for fast browsing [besides: the mouse requires extra coding and therefore cpu cycles compared to the keyboard - the keyboard is driven in the IOS but the mouse requires a driver]. A very nasty omission is the Opera-Link. I use the Operausb version when I help the less digital knowledgeable persons so that I can start Opera without having to use the person's own browser. With Opera-Link I can quickly get all my setting and passwords without having to type them while others are looking on. But I will continue to test new versions when they come available - I am having a look at Opera Next to see when I can change my default browser from Opera12.17 to Opera2x,
