I have already reported this as a bug in some of the previous releases, and it has been fixed. With the latest opera version problem is there again, just not the same (it was reverse order back then).

• So, have a couple of pages saved in speed dials folder, let's say "1", "2" and "3".
• Use Open all in new tabs option
• New tab (current, empty) remains - and tabs are opened in 2-3-1 order (if more than 3, let's say 4, the order is 2-3-4-1, where "1" is opened as last tab).

Interestingly, when Open in new window option is used - order is correct.

I agree that this could be an option for synchronization.

But I strongly disagree this being a default behavior, i.e. not having speed dials folders as it is now. The way it is now is the exact behavior as I would expect and a top implemented feature. I don't want the same speed dials on my work and home PC, and actually need third set for my phone.

I wanted to try the new Firefox Quantum and had a terrible time making it work like this with the Top Sites similar to Opera Speed Dial feature.

@ar7ur3k Well if you had actually read the thread, you would have noticed that not everyone see a problem there.

Wooowzeeeee!!

@leocg My man.

Is there a way to access My Flow except from the sidebar?

I do not want sidebar to be visible, I do not find the way to at least have it auto-hidden (which would be a bad, but a workaround) and right click on empty part of the page and selecting My Flow seems to have a bug (does not display anything if (again) sidebar is hidden).

@quicksite But I suppose your reply is very helpful, arguments full and strictly related to the topic. Oh wait...

First of all, I am not member of the Opera team, nor I am related to the software in any way (has to be repeated for the slow ones obviously). I was simply explaining my point of view, and explained it in details whatsoever. So I am also a user posting about a request that conflicts with others' request. What is the rule of User Experience Design that solves this problem? And could you please explain how the sentence I find it hard to grasp that user case turned into why would you ever want to do that? in your twisted mind?

Your lousy attempt of being a psychologist is funny as well. It's nicely wrapped packet of insults with fallacies instead of arguments. It's summed in one word - projection.

@neoseo I find it hard to grasp that use case, but ok. Is there any other browser that suites? As far as I know, none of the 98% market share.

@neoseo This post is about Speed Dials not Bookmarks, those are synced across devices (even android ones). So you calculus is basically crap.

Or you'are actually telling me that you change speed dials every day? That issue won't be resolved by any feature in the browser bro.

@Atemporaryson The amount of time necessary to simply select all the speed dials and copy to another device is roughly ~ 30 seconds (including starting the browser and going to bookmarks link). I'm talking about using actual PC, since neither Google Chrome nor Firefox offer sync across Android devices, for instance. How often do you actually change PC/laptop? Is it really possible that this (let it be) minute means so much to you?

Let's say you are the project manager in Opera dev team, and that I am your superior. Please elaborate (with actual arguments for a change, spare me the beliefs and thoughts) on why this feature should be implemented.

@ar7ur3k Well if you had actually read the thread, you would have noticed that not everyone see a problem there.

@leocg said in Why not - "Restart" instead of 'update now' ??:

te process will only complete after the restart, so I guess that ' update now' is correct.

Yes but Restart is obviously the first action, and the one user initiates. How you said it, one would think that Restart now is not correct.

I have already reported this as a bug in some of the previous releases, and it has been fixed. With the latest opera version problem is there again, just not the same (it was reverse order back then).

• So, have a couple of pages saved in speed dials folder, let's say "1", "2" and "3".
• Use Open all in new tabs option
• New tab (current, empty) remains - and tabs are opened in 2-3-1 order (if more than 3, let's say 4, the order is 2-3-4-1, where "1" is opened as last tab).

Interestingly, when Open in new window option is used - order is correct.

*from my point of view