Share a Picture
-
Deleted User last edited by
Yes, you did. Furthermore, everyone reading this thread who has even a modicum of intelligence now knows exactly the sort of person you are. Do you really want that, joshl? Because of your pride (and immaturity) you've exposed yourself by lying and through hypocrisy. I'm not going to let this go until you either apologize OR at least admit the truth. Now you can continue to deny it but that would only make things worse for you OR you can put me on your ignore list and I'll drop the matter. But I have no intentions of dropping this and letting you off the hook, so to speak. The ball is in your court.
-
-
A Former User last edited by
And by the way, from the title and OP:
<h1>Share a Picture
Something of interest, or of beauty...
So I insist your quarrel about the terms of this thread makes no good to the thread.
You share pictures that may a) interest others in a way (if they might not understand your point - you'd better say a coupl'a words)
or
b) represent some human understanding of what's beautiful (like ---ing naked women, o'k? you personally don't like naked women?
).
You surely may consider other categories - as long as your shared pictures make sense and can be understood by other Operaforums users in one way or another (with a sort of description or "speaking for themselves"). And I can assure you, while I never mind brick walls, cement walls, tile floors, whatever, I strongly believe most people would consider women MUCH more entertaining than window-frames, roof sidings and other constructional stuff.
-
Deleted User last edited by
There are a lot of pictures you posted here that do not have a description.
-
A Former User last edited by
Stop posting off topic, please - I've already shown the parsing of what this thread's about. You can read.
Now a note about the sizes. (@sidneyneto)
I can realise why somebody would not understand the necessity of certain limits - they have good hardware, good browser, good connection...
Still, there are others.As this thread is meant entirely for images (only; various metadata are auxiliary), imagine the weight of an entire page full of images.
And myself personally noticed that in most (all) of my browsers ANY showing/rendering of an image up/close to (or more than) 1 MB takes, say, an effort: even while scrolling through the ALREADY FULLY LOADED page, such images "blink" (as if loading anew) - every time.So the rule is: post an image up to 1 MB, or a SLIGHT bit higher - IF you have to choose between a [presumably worse], say, 500 kB one and, say, 1.1 MB. BUT - try to avoid ANY higher size images when you post MORE THAN ONE in the same post.
It's simple, I guess.That's all, thank everybody for their consideration, let's go back to topic - namely sharing pictures.
-
Deleted User last edited by
No, we will not return to the topic at hand until you're ready to admit what you've been trying to do. I'm very clear on what this thread is all about and I was clear when I posted my image of the brick wall. I followed all the so-called rules set for sharing the image so there is no point in repeating them above. You, however, questioned my first image by asking where the description was which was clearly NOT part of the rules established. When I pointed that out to you, rather than admit you were wrong you proceeded to create an argument. YOU are the perpetrator of the arguing here. I'm simply defending myself and exposing you for what you are and evidently you can't take it.
You are trying to obfuscate, Joshl, but you're only fooling yourself and no one else. I have clearly demonstrated your hypocrisy for all to see so I'm not going to repeat it. Clearly anyone can see what you are now doing and I'm afraid that this doesn't let you off the hook. You're simply digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself and are beginning to show another side (and not a pretty one I might add). I've nothing against your NAKED woman (or as you first tried to claim: manikin). You simply have tried to use this to divert attention away from your hypocrisy but I'm not that dense nor are others.
Grow up. Start acting like a mature and honest human being and admit when you are wrong as you clearly are now. Enough said?
-
-
-
A Former User last edited by
Just a road.
It's not "just a road" - it's a beautiful composition*
*
Thank you. -
Deleted User last edited by
No description... LOL
Good stuff, sidney. I wonder where it leads to?I don't see every picture with description, so I did not put one.
-
-
-
linuxmint7 last edited by
Rainbow Islands (with description)
Rainbow Islands: "The game is sometimes called "Bubble Bobble 2". However, two other games --"Bubble Symphony: The Story of Bubble Bobble 2" and "Bubble Bobble 2"-- claim the same name. Rainbow Islands happens after Bubble Bobble. Bubble Symphony happens after Bubble Memories, which is called Bubble Bobble 3, so Bubble Symphony is really Bubble Bobble 4 or 5. Bubble Bobble 2 also happens after Bubble Memories, so it is either Bubble Bobble 4 or 5. Bubble Symphony's song titles, which refer to Bub and Bob as "Grandfather", are true, then Bubble Symphony is Bubble Bobble 5 and Bubble Bobble 2, which features Robby, the "son", is Bubble Bobble 4. But then again, the intro of Bubble Symphony refers to Bubby and Bobby as the children of Bub and Bob, so Bubble Symphony is Bubble Bobble 4".
-
A Former User last edited by
Linux, to share a picture you must like the picture itself (or wish to show it), not some story.
So I mean, picture goes first - even if alone (the best case, by the way - when it "speaks for itself"). Then - IF the picture needs some explanation, or you just like to add something - then it goes. O'k? -
linuxmint7 last edited by
Like the picture ?. Check. Yes I certainly do, I use to play this game (with friends) so much when I was younger, So many fun memories.
Picture goes first ?, Check. Picture is first (above the text).
If the picture need some explanation ? Check. Picture many need a description as some may not know what it is or never heard of it. And I felt it needed a bit of a description anyway.
All boxes ticked and all in check, so I guess that's a pass.
-
A Former User last edited by
I don't know...
I guess you might like the game, and this picture just reminds you of that game... Right?:sherlock: -
-
-
l33t4opera last edited bySince we are on the football topic
here you go: "Funny football pictures - players and parade of blunders" \m/ :cheers: -
LOL
