They seem to work fine together. I have the 64 bit version because I play Minecraft and want to assign more memory some times. But if you never use any Java programs that can use a lot of memory, such as games, graphics editors, or scrypt software, then you're better off using only the 32-bit version, as two versions are twice the effort to keep up to date.
Latest posts made by knutremi
-
RE: Unable to make Java run in Opera 19 on WindowsOpera for Windows
-
RE: Unable to make Java run in Opera 19 on WindowsOpera for Windows
I must have looked in the wrong place for the architecture type. And it also seems you can only tell by the installation path (contains x86). Seems Chrome made me install the 32-bit version of Java, which fixed it.
-
Unable to make Java run in Opera 19 on WindowsOpera for Windows
I'm using
64-bitOpera 19.0.1326.59 on Windows 8.1 64-bit and 7 64-bit. My Java version is Java 7 Update 51 (64-bit). When ever I go to Java.com and click on "Do I have Java" then "Verify Java version" a gray square saying "This plugin is not supported" is shown. I've searched around to see if the behavior in my specific case is documented anywhere but was unable to find any useful information. I've tried reinstalling both Opera and Java, and rebooting each time. Neither worked.Are anyone else experiencing the same?
Does anyone know how to fix it?
If it's intentional, why?Edit: After installing Chrome, and going to Java.com to test, I was prompted to install Java. The installation worked, and suddenly, it works in Opera as well now. I find this a less than ideal solution for Opera users. I would prefer if we didn't have to use other browsers to fix our plugins.