Opera 17, pros and cons
-
quhno last edited by
Originally posted by Pesala:
Since the trolls hate Opera Blink so much, I wonder why they don't just use older version or other browsers?
You mean like the troll with the skull and crossed bones as avatar does if he isn't testing but doing serious work? :p
But that troll doesn't hate blink or any other rendering engine - he just doesn't like what was made from it by Opera and still hopes that something decent will come out of this mess. As it is, it simply does not work in his work environment while the other major browsers do. No day with at least 4 or 5 crashes of the new "Opera", heck until todays 18 next update he couldn't even open up Photoshop without crashing the browser. Not even the daily 1 to 4 snapshots of Chromium (the original) are *that* instable.
At the moment he is a happy camper with 9.27 (real MDI, sometimes he needs that) 11.64 (rock solid and he still can and does use Widgets and Unite) and 12.16 x64 (rock solid too and M2 is still integrated). He never saw a reason to use Mail 1.0. Yes, he downloaded it, installed it and then deleted it - it is basically a crippled 12.16 and has no advantages over the integrated solution, not even in size. For special cases he uses the latest Firefox, Chromium and Internet Explorer, but not Opera 17++, because Opera 17++ causes more problems than it solves. Yes, until recently he wrote bug reports, but somehow he got discouraged ...
... oh, and don't feed him, he is perfectly capable of hunting for himself.
-
frenzie last edited by
Originally posted by QuHno:
But that troll doesn't hate blink or any other rendering engine - he just doesn't like what was made from it by Opera and still hopes that something decent will come out of this mess. As it is, it simply does not work in his work environment while the other major browsers do. No day with at least 4 or 5 crashes of the new "Opera", heck until todays 18 next update he couldn't even open up Photoshop without crashing the browser. Not even the daily 1 to 4 snapshots of Chromium (the original) are *that* instable.
+1
Originally posted by QuHno:
Yes, until recently he wrote bug reports, but somehow he got discouraged ...
Me too. What's the point if these bugs have already been in the Webkit bug tracker for a decade? I thought Opera might care a bit more about the major regressions that come with Blink.
As it happens this one bug I reported was actually taken up by someone at Intel, which pleasantly surprised me, but unfortunately it now seems to be in some kind of bug fixing limbo. I'd just like to emphasize this is something Presto has done right for years.
-
blackbird71 last edited byOriginally posted by QuHno:
... Interestingly, despite just alienating "a mere 7%" of their user base, they lost 25% of the income from desktop - which doesn't look like a good management decision. It seems that the users who switched to another browser were power surfers who generated a lot referral link income with their searches etc.:
Originally posted by Opera ASA Q3 financial report:
Revenue from Desktop decreased by 25% in 3Q13 versus 3Q12, due to a decrease in ARPU (Average Revenue Per User), primarily due to less search and license revenue and a user decline of 7% in 3Q13 versus 3Q12.
Source: http://www.operasoftware.com/content/download/4580/153912/version/2/file/3Q13.pdf ... Opera ASA has lost about 10k desktop users per day since they decided to switch to chromium.
It should prove interesting whether the declining stats become an ultimate rationale for Opera departing entirely from the desktop scene. After all, desktop systems are supposedly going extinct under the mobile-device onslaught, according to the prophets of desktop doom. These stats could readily be cited as simply unfolding proof of all that, by those whose minds are already made up. There's an old saying: "When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything tends to look like a nail." Opera (and a lot of the digital trend-riders) are now enamored of mobile everything... and therefore, they have a built-in tendency to view all things through 'mobile' lenses. Which, I believe, explains a lot of things with regard to the nature of Blink Opera's desktop browser... especially the dismissiveness with which many user complaints have been handled.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Originally posted by QuHno:
But that troll doesn't hate blink or any other rendering engine - he just doesn't like what was made from it by Opera and still hopes that something decent will come out of this mess.
Hope dies last but keep in mind please that nothing lasts forever
Originally posted by Frenzie:
What's the point if these bugs have already been in the Webkit bug tracker for a decade? I thought Opera might care a bit more about the major regressions that come with Blink.
They seem to be overextended with building a shell for Blink and you want them to fix the new engine? You must be kidding
-
frenzie last edited by
Originally posted by Krake:
They seem to be overextended with building a shell for Blink and you want them to fix the new engine? You must be kidding
As it happens they've got people working on the engine separately from people working on the chrome.
One of them is working on fixing Blink's broken video APIs, which may technically be fixing regressions compared to Presto. But the thing is, I want to report these regressions to Opera because they're only regressions for Opera. In Blink, it's all just bugs that've been there since Apple forked KHTML, with corresponding unfixed Webkit bug reports to boot. -
quhno last edited by
Originally posted by Frenzie:
In Blink, it's all just bugs that've been there since Apple forked KHTML, with corresponding unfixed Webkit bug reports to boot.
That hits the point. If Google or Apple as main contributors did not use it on their websites, it was of no bigger interest and you could wait until the sun explodes, e.g. I still wait for a fix about font—or, better—character replacement. Opera 12 did a great job with it.
Explanation for all who want to know what that means:
If some character was not in the CSS defined or replaced fonts, it used the character from the most similar font you had installed. In doubt it used even a fonts that did not look similar if the character was in there—on my system it even used the Unicode BMP Fallback Font if nothing else worked out for really esoteric characters, which was still better than displaying ???? instead of foreign characters like the whole Chromium bunch does.I am really waiting for that bug to get fixed. At the moment Opera is worse than Chromium when it comes to charsets and font replacement as I noticed in
DNA-13074 where Chromium had no problem with it and Opera 17 -19 displayed ??? instead of the Big5 Chinese character set. -
frenzie last edited by
Originally posted by QuHno:
If some character was not in the CSS defined or replaced fonts, it used the character from the most similar font you had installed. In doubt it used even a fonts that did not look similar if the character was in there—on my system it even used the Unicode BMP Fallback Font if nothing else worked out for really esoteric characters, which was still better than displaying ???? instead of foreign characters like the whole Chromium bunch does.
Everyone knows Gecko's typographical performance is far superior to any other graphical browser's (if we don't count Prince). Opera has some odd issues with changing characters to a different font following a font substitution on Windows (not on Linux!), so I can understand why some might disprefer it. However, Chrome is at least as buggy as IE in font choices…
-
rs79 last edited by
" that is most certainly not a "show-stopping bug". Nor is it clear to me that this problem "makes it impossible to use Chrome or Opera 17 to edit stuff on the web". Is there some reason that you cannot either open the page in a new tab or simply complete the process and then start the editing over again if necessary?"
Have you ever actually done any work on the web?
Edit, save, back, edit save back edit save back. That's what it looks like. No really. People do this 8 hours a day, 4 hours a week. Millions of them.
You not want to make their 8 hour day a 9.5 hour day because of an old chrome bug? (really old)
Opera forgetting about this sole feature that got their browser in the drivers seas *as the only one* that would work properly. But now Mozilla does and Opera doesn't.
Your utterly idiotic suggestion makes about as much sense as using crayons and poster paper. It may work for you but it's not what grownups do.
Why should Opera give 12 away? Well, crap, I dunno. Isn't that better than dong NOTHING with it or throwing it out? Was that a trick question?
I really shouldn't have to justify a browser not destroying hours of typed user data when it didn't used to and now does because of "improvements".
-
rs79 last edited by
The more I look at it the more I think V8 was a good idea but I'm having a real problem understanding the move to WebKit. Sure the new Opera makes more old demos work an that's a plus but there were easier ways of supporting obsolete webkit prefix stuff.
Presto was a lot closer to webkit compatibility than I think Opera thought it was. You can sort of tell what happened and when by studying he behavior of all the prefixed stuff. It's really quite fascinating.
I'd be really interested in seeing Opera 12 with the V8 engine but no webkit. I'm not sure what was actually gained by the move to webkit, by that I mean the hours spend getting that to work if they'd been put into presto, I really think I've had tried that first. If nothing else it would have eliminated all the things people have complained about in the Chrome/Opera hybrid.
-
cogitosum last edited by
Originally posted by leushino:
You want the new browser to have all the features of the old. Perhaps over time it will have nearly all of this plus other unique features but it's going to take more time.
Everyone here has a critical comment. RS79 was accurate, I bitched about 2 removals from Opera12. Every other criticism ought to be considered. It doesn't matter that the Opera development team "think" they've got it right, they haven't. Instead of defending a defective product, consider what's been said here and try to address the issues. And by the way, yes, I have been a devotee of Opera since way back when I had to pay for it. Then, it was worth it, But now.....
-
frenzie last edited by
Originally posted by rs79:
I haven't used it in ages because forms didn't work, just uninstalled it and installed the latest (25) tried it and it seems to work with forms just fine. I'll have to test it long term to see it never glitches ever, but it does appear to work now. Finally. At freaking last. Good job.
Like I said, I believe the fix landed with Firefox 23 (but I could be wrong). Also note that Firefox has certain useful extensions. (Not sure if that's the best or anything.)
-
zogoibi last edited by
Originally posted by Pesala:
Originally posted by rs79:
Forms have been destroyed.
The best thing to do about that is to submit" target="_blank">https://bugs.opera.com/wizarddesktop/]submit a bug report. Ranting here won't help.
Totally disagree. Ranting here can, in a given case, help much more than filing bug reports, because every profane like me can and will read this forums, Opera devs and staff included; rants here can be (and are) quoted in professional reviews, understood and supported by so many people; all of which can somehow influence the path to be taken by the product responsibles. And, in any case, ranting here helps more than rudely trying to "kick out" of Opera to whomever disagrees with the new approach. The "you're free to take it or leave it" philosophy only leads to isolation and, eventually, failure.
-
Deleted User last edited by
Ranting never accomplishes anything other than stirring up strife and causing trouble. If you have specific features you miss, post them in the appropriate forum for desktop wishes. If you want to make a point about something specific, post that in the dev forums where they will be more likely to be seen and possibly addressed. Complaining and ranting here will do nothing positive other than provide a means of venting. If that's what you need to do - vent - fine. Bottom line however is that Opera will not be resurrecting Presto but will continue to develop Blink so deal with it.
-
A Former User last edited by
Originally posted by zogoibi:
And, in any case, ranting here helps more than rudely trying to "kick out" of Opera to whomever disagrees with the new approach.
You won't find anyone rudely trying to kick out those who disagree with the new approach. I disagree with the new approach in that they offer Opera 17 as the default download instead of Opera 12.16. They should have waited until it was ready for real use before promoting it so strongly. Release it as soon as it's stable by all means, but announce it as Opera Next, or as "Something new to try," not as the latest and recommended version of Opera.
Even now, Opera 12.16 won't find Opera 17 if you check for updates, but most would completely miss the link for Opera 12 on the download page.
What people should get kicked out for is attacks on Opera employees, or repeated trolling of the forums with negative comments. This forums are provided by Opera ASA, and active support is provided by other Opera users. There's no point at all in ranting at other users, who might actually be able to help you find a workaround. The devs rarely visit these forums, nor should they.
-
zogoibi last edited by
Originally posted by leushino:
Ranting never accomplishes anything other than stirring up strife and causing trouble.
Funny that precisely You say so, the aggressive stalwart.
Originally posted by leushino:
Complaining and ranting here will do nothing positive other than provide a means of venting. If that's what you need to do - vent - fine.
Finally! Thanks for your permission. But once again, that's your point of view; I really believe that the responsibles take down, directly or indirectly, what is written here.
Originally posted by leushino:
Bottom line however is that Opera will not be resurrecting Presto but will continue to develop Blink so deal with it.
Which seems to give you some kind of intimate satisfaction?
Yes, you bet I'm dealing with it. In turn, perhaps you ought to deal with user's complaints, accept them and chill out.Originally posted by Pesala:
What people should get kicked out for...
Oh, they should! Should they?
Originally posted by Pesala:
The devs rarely visit these forums, nor should they.
Shouldn't they?
Too many "shoulds" for my taste. In any case, I don't mind so much who exactly reads these posts, as far as part of the staff does, or professional reviewers, which is the case. And that's enough for me. -
Deleted User last edited by
I think you just like to whine and complain. You don't want options or workarounds so why bother to come and bitch here? This forum is supposed to be users helping users NOT users bitching to other users to foment some sort of uprising. If you don't like the new browser STAY with the OLD. After all.. the old browser was so very beloved that it should not be an effort to stay with it. What's your problem? It's still receiving security updates isn't it? And while you're using the old watch the development of Opera Next until it meets your needs.
BUT.. my gut feeling tells me it's more convenient to just complain and whine.
-
rs79 last edited by
"My point here was that this problem did not constitute a "show stopper" for most users."
You think it's ok people can type into a form, hit a button by mistake, then be sent off to another page - oops - so they go back and OH LOOK all their typing is gone.
You don't think this is a problem? Really? Ok lemme change the question from "have you ever actually worked on the web?" to "Have you actually used the Internet?"
You're not sure "millions of people" have this problem. Not sure. And offer no proof.
OOOooooooooook...
There's a little company in California called Facebook who have a fairly popular website. They just added a javascript hack to prevent this problem from occurring for their over ONE BILLION users.
And that, spud, *is* "most people.
Most people really don't like when you delete what they spent time typing it. No, really. It's true. Because you see they have to type it again now and it's never going to get the same amount of effort put into and and congratulations a browser bug just contributed to a lessor output from humanity.
It's a bug, not a feature. No kidding.
You don't know what you're talking about. Literally.
