@leocg You clearly don't know anything about AI, bing is a search engine that includes (not "may inculde") an AI chatbot not based on ChatGPT but on GPT-4, and you probably didn't even read my reply, I said that it doesn't include sources (you said it browses the web, so it has to include the websites that it uses as sources for a specific question, ai is still un-accurate, so fact checking is not an optional, by not adding the sources, aria becomes useless for researching purpouses. p.s: there are no AIs based on chatgpt, you have to know the difference between an ai service (ChatGPT in this case) and an AI model (gpt 3.5 that powers chatgpt and most of the chatbots or gpt-4 that powers chatgpt plus and bing) I said that it should include sources, like all the chatbots that have web capabilites. it is unacceptable that it doesn't show them.
Posts made by voltadvance
-
RE: Aria is really good, but it could be better.Feedback
-
RE: Aria is really good, but it could be better.Feedback
@leocg No (?) Take bing or bard or even web browsing ChatGPT or Perplexity or Phind, that is an issue, it needs to be fixed.
-
RE: Aria is really good, but it could be better.Feedback
@leocg I am not able to see the sources, they could be fake news, and fact checking wouldn't be easy
-
Aria is really good, but it could be better.Feedback
I must say that the tool is really good and fast in generating accurate results. It has been a great help in my work and has saved me a lot of time. However, I would like to point out that the tool lacks an actual website, and being able to access it only from the sidebar is uncomfortable. It would be perfect if it had a web search feature that would allow users to access it more easily.