Posts made by b00blik

@ultramax: same here

@SilentHugOfDoom said in Signal messenger:

it too has a web client

@SilentHugOfDoom said in Signal messenger:

it too has a web client

it doesn't not exist and probably wont. They explained it many times

"The fundamental problem with web interfaces is: there's no way to version, sign and securely distribute a web page. Instead, you're re-requesting the code you'll run every single time you visit the site (making audits practically impossible).

This effectively reduces the security of your end-to-end encrypted communication to that of your SSL connection to the server, i.e. you're only as secure as the CA system. Anyone able to intercept the client-server SSL connection (and the server itself) can silently change the code you receive and execute, with a very low risk of getting caught. This is why products which offer end-to-end encrypted communication through in-browser crypto are often considered snake oil, unless they use some form of a packaged & signed browser extension."

its 2020 and still no sign of signal

great proposal, mindblowing that such niche messengers with no utility are integrated and signal is not.

Great idea and cant understand how is it possible to make such a mess out of such good idea