What is wrong with the Opera's ecosystem?
A Former User last edited by
I do not want to say here that Opera is bad and what's worse in Opera on the example of its ecosystem. I do not know how others but more and more looking at the movements of the opera that are sometimes cool, eg VPN or its own advertising blocker, it obscures his sins which is some forced downloading several versions of the Opera to use or see how it works and more often I mean here example of the Touch Opera and the "traditional" version of the Opera on android where to use the my flow function, the user must use the Opera Touch despite the more "traditional" version and to some extent I understand that Opera touch is the only version on IOS and that it would be useful to increase the number of downloads of it giving one thing which for the synchronization that so proudly advertises is necessary for another browser to increase its number of downloads but it wipes the user from the feeling of one platform and not shared and instead of doing something in one browser and throw it to continue doing what the mobile version only on the desktop must jump between two times mobile browsers. But it is worse with Deskopow browser where now we will have 3 versions of "stable" Opera, Opera GX and Opera Neon where each of them offers something different and does not allow in one browser, eg. Use the appearance of the Neon Opera (it's a pity that it is not supported anymore) while maintaining options with The stable opera and the same story will repeat with the GX Opera which will be a separate browser for the players instead of giving in the Opera without GX in the name option from this Gaming Opera and call it an alternative option that you can use instead of forcing you to download another unnecessary browser. Instead of creating a really good experience, you divide it by covering it with commercials, messages about the amazing things, etc., the user wants particulars and not hindering the willingness to use a given function. On the one hand, the synchronization works very well on the other, cutting off from it the options that are available only for your other browser so that if you do not download it, etc. This is to the detriment of the user and I seriously tried to find explanations that are rational and give me a sense of this that, however, Opera also needs some profit to test a given function, but not Opera just covers a certain kind of hopelessness and a desire for pure profit, regardless of the user's features that are really useful but in general, working with the Opera is to some extent and will not save this advertisement " safer browsers "or" new features that will change your work style download now "etc. And at the same time summarizing Opera does a good job just to cover his evil nature.