Here is my vision of adding extensions to the opera.
Appearance in settings.

Appearance in the "start menu".

The appearance of updating.

Removal appearance.
p.s sorry for sloppiness in my work and Polish but I did not have time to do it better.

I would like the Opera to return to its heritage and replace the google engine with a Presto. Looking at the browser market simulation it would be a rather risky move, but it could add a breath of freshness and more variety. I remember the opera's glory days and they can't even be compared to the situation of the opera now, which is practically still struggling for interest, instead of just keeping it.

I do not want to say here that Opera is bad and what's worse in Opera on the example of its ecosystem. I do not know how others but more and more looking at the movements of the opera that are sometimes cool, eg VPN or its own advertising blocker, it obscures his sins which is some forced downloading several versions of the Opera to use or see how it works and more often I mean here example of the Touch Opera and the "traditional" version of the Opera on android where to use the my flow function, the user must use the Opera Touch despite the more "traditional" version and to some extent I understand that Opera touch is the only version on IOS and that it would be useful to increase the number of downloads of it giving one thing which for the synchronization that so proudly advertises is necessary for another browser to increase its number of downloads but it wipes the user from the feeling of one platform and not shared and instead of doing something in one browser and throw it to continue doing what the mobile version only on the desktop must jump between two times mobile browsers. But it is worse with Deskopow browser where now we will have 3 versions of "stable" Opera, Opera GX and Opera Neon where each of them offers something different and does not allow in one browser, eg. Use the appearance of the Neon Opera (it's a pity that it is not supported anymore) while maintaining options with The stable opera and the same story will repeat with the GX Opera which will be a separate browser for the players instead of giving in the Opera without GX in the name option from this Gaming Opera and call it an alternative option that you can use instead of forcing you to download another unnecessary browser. Instead of creating a really good experience, you divide it by covering it with commercials, messages about the amazing things, etc., the user wants particulars and not hindering the willingness to use a given function. On the one hand, the synchronization works very well on the other, cutting off from it the options that are available only for your other browser so that if you do not download it, etc. This is to the detriment of the user and I seriously tried to find explanations that are rational and give me a sense of this that, however, Opera also needs some profit to test a given function, but not Opera just covers a certain kind of hopelessness and a desire for pure profit, regardless of the user's features that are really useful but in general, working with the Opera is to some extent and will not save this advertisement " safer browsers "or" new features that will change your work style download now "etc. And at the same time summarizing Opera does a good job just to cover his evil nature.

In my opinion, in the "normal" opera, my flow from the opera touch should appear. Because it is quite ridiculous that the opera gave birth to the options and the appearance between the two apications instead of opere touch, give as an option of personalization in the normal opera.

Maybe, instead of developing two browsers with the same functionality, combine them into one? This would be much better than separating a useful my flow function into a separate browser, whose interface could be transferred to a traditional opera as an option to change the form of the browser's appearance/navigation. Because why have two browsers from the same brand, because they were forced by the constraints made by the Opera team?

I would like the Opera to return to its heritage and replace the google engine with a Presto. Looking at the browser market simulation it would be a rather risky move, but it could add a breath of freshness and more variety. I remember the opera's glory days and they can't even be compared to the situation of the opera now, which is practically still struggling for interest, instead of just keeping it.

Maybe, instead of developing two browsers with the same functionality, combine them into one? This would be much better than separating a useful my flow function into a separate browser, whose interface could be transferred to a traditional opera as an option to change the form of the browser's appearance/navigation. Because why have two browsers from the same brand, because they were forced by the constraints made by the Opera team?

I do not want to say here that Opera is bad and what's worse in Opera on the example of its ecosystem. I do not know how others but more and more looking at the movements of the opera that are sometimes cool, eg VPN or its own advertising blocker, it obscures his sins which is some forced downloading several versions of the Opera to use or see how it works and more often I mean here example of the Touch Opera and the "traditional" version of the Opera on android where to use the my flow function, the user must use the Opera Touch despite the more "traditional" version and to some extent I understand that Opera touch is the only version on IOS and that it would be useful to increase the number of downloads of it giving one thing which for the synchronization that so proudly advertises is necessary for another browser to increase its number of downloads but it wipes the user from the feeling of one platform and not shared and instead of doing something in one browser and throw it to continue doing what the mobile version only on the desktop must jump between two times mobile browsers. But it is worse with Deskopow browser where now we will have 3 versions of "stable" Opera, Opera GX and Opera Neon where each of them offers something different and does not allow in one browser, eg. Use the appearance of the Neon Opera (it's a pity that it is not supported anymore) while maintaining options with The stable opera and the same story will repeat with the GX Opera which will be a separate browser for the players instead of giving in the Opera without GX in the name option from this Gaming Opera and call it an alternative option that you can use instead of forcing you to download another unnecessary browser. Instead of creating a really good experience, you divide it by covering it with commercials, messages about the amazing things, etc., the user wants particulars and not hindering the willingness to use a given function. On the one hand, the synchronization works very well on the other, cutting off from it the options that are available only for your other browser so that if you do not download it, etc. This is to the detriment of the user and I seriously tried to find explanations that are rational and give me a sense of this that, however, Opera also needs some profit to test a given function, but not Opera just covers a certain kind of hopelessness and a desire for pure profit, regardless of the user's features that are really useful but in general, working with the Opera is to some extent and will not save this advertisement " safer browsers "or" new features that will change your work style download now "etc. And at the same time summarizing Opera does a good job just to cover his evil nature.

It would be useful to add a Qwant search engine, it would be good to improve the loading of applications, improve the thumbnails of the pages that are directed to the upper left corner, better blocking ads with adding your own exceptions to individual ads and not entire pages and blocked items, would be useful for synchronizing my flow, which it's in the touch version. that's all, that's what I want to see at Opera 53.

@sgunhouse said in Opera GX is coming soon...:

We don't know that yet, you should wait to see what it is.

even the presentation graphics have been copied so it's hard to talk about the original idea here.

You can see that the opera is running out of good ideas so as this old Chinese custom says copy-sell but it's a pity that they take ideas from the real spiritual successor of the opera on the engine presto called Vivaldi and I recommend you look at it before you start praising this very originally copied idea from it. By the way, if you really like the personalization of the opera, in Vivaldi you get lost so much you can change in the browser's appearance and adapt to your own preferences and not as you like in the opera because there the user is the most important.

@themaciekk The worst idea of ​​the Opera for a long time and a poor copy of Vivaldi, and not Vivaldi did not make a separate browser for several options. Something you do not do Opera oh, it's not so.️

From the latest update to the beta opera there is a problem with switching between the browser tabs.

Here is my vision of adding extensions to the opera.
Appearance in settings.

Appearance in the "start menu".

The appearance of updating.

Removal appearance.
p.s sorry for sloppiness in my work and Polish but I did not have time to do it better.

In my opinion, in the "normal" opera, my flow from the opera touch should appear. Because it is quite ridiculous that the opera gave birth to the options and the appearance between the two apications instead of opere touch, give as an option of personalization in the normal opera.