<![CDATA[Referenced links are not check for duplicity]]>

<![CDATA[Referenced links are not check for duplicity]]>Please work on the UI for Aria as it works in the sidebar.

When there are highlighted words in the response, hovering over them shows that they are URLs to either search engine links or to some other reference.

When links are included in the answer, they are not checked for repeats or essentially being the same as other links. This can be very repetitive.

In a recent question to Aria, the answer was good, but the repeated inclusion of the links was a little annoying. In the answer I received, it only needed, at most, four links. Instead, between repeating links and minor variations, it had 28 URLs (see example of list of links, below).

If the output was scrubbed and only: a) similar or essentially similar links were collapsed into a single link, and, b) only the first occurrence of link was kept, it would result in a better output. An alternative would be to c) collect the links as footnotes, and reduce that set. This is similar to what Wikipedia and other reference-ful websites do.

]]>https://forums.opera.com/topic/66547/referenced-links-are-not-check-for-duplicityRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 18:20:57 GMTTue, 26 Sep 2023 22:02:47 GMT60