<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Opera shouldn&#x27;t be partnering with Eneba for the deals aggregator]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Of course, I don't specifically know if Opera are partnering with Eneba or if they're just appearing in there because of the algorithm. But I never see anyone else in the deals aggregator section except Eneba.</p>
<p dir="auto">Regardless of whether or not they're trustworthy, they're a grey market reseller, and they're inherently bad for the industry. GX purports to be a browser targeted toward gamers: grey market resellers are bad for the industry and bad for individual gamers. They disproportionately harm indie studios, and it's a bad look for Opera to be including them.</p>
<p dir="auto">Notwithstanding that "deals aggregator" suggests that deals are being, well, aggregated. And they're not. They're just listing Eneba products. You could, for example, partner with <a href="http://isthereanydeal.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">isthereanydeal.com</a> or gg.deals - that would truly aggregate deals from legitimate resellers.</p>
<p dir="auto">I did turn off the aggregator. But it's worth thinking about who Opera want to associate themselves with if they want to pursue the "gamer" branding and "gamer" features.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forums.opera.com/topic/39697/opera-shouldn-t-be-partnering-with-eneba-for-the-deals-aggregator</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:33:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forums.opera.com/topic/39697.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 04:10:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>